Date post: | 27-Jul-2015 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | meys-msmt-in-czech |
View: | 59 times |
Download: | 0 times |
IPN Metodika
Základní struktury
hodnocení
Daniel Münich
www.metodika.reformy-msmt.cz
Seminář MŠMT, 10.02.2015
From a perspective
1
Pilot testing
2
Inst. Structure of Assessment: HEIs (VŠ)
3
VŠ = Research Organization
(RO)
Faculty EvU#1
Research Unit - RU#1a
Research Unit - RU#1b
Faculty EvU#2
Research Unit - RU#2a
Inst. structure of Assessment: non-HEIs
4
Research organisation
(RO)
RO=Institute EvU
Research Unit - RU#1a
Research Unit - RU#1b
RO=Institute
EvU
Research Unit - RU#2a
Panel structure
5
New Evaluation Methodology
6 Source: Technopolis, 1. Final Report
Organizational Scheme
7
Source: Technopolis, 1. final report
Dimensions of Assessment
8
• -----------
• -----------
• -----------
• -----------
• -----------
• -----------
• -----------
• -----------
• -----------
• -----------
• -----------
• -----------
Management
& potential
Membership of
research
community
Research
excellence
Research
performance
Information Peer
review
• Star rating
• Strategic
feedback
• Star rating
• Strategic
feedback
• Star rating
• Strategic
feedback
• Star rating
• Strategic
feedback
• -----------
• -----------
• ----------- Societal
relevance
• Star rating
• Strategic
feedback
Money ‘pot’ per
institution type
% % % %
% % % %
% % % %
% % % %
% % % %
Institutiona
l research
funding per
evaluated
RU
Source: Technopolis, Presentation by Erik Arnold (Technopolis) , Jan 7, 2014
Assessment and policy objectives
9 Source: Technopolis, 1. final report
Ratings
10
Source: Technopolis, 1. Final report