-
-
P –
M - Zvláštní vydání
v.v.i.
v
Obsah
1
9
16
27
O2
MIROSLAV MACÁK, LADISLAV
31
,
39
Á
46
51
AV VÁVRA
56
63
68
MIROSLAV MIMRA
78
84
88
-
92
V
98
U
102
108
112
117
V V
125
131
BARBORA
136
141
148
ÁK, PAVEL
152
159
167
173
178
186
193
–
201
206
216
223
-
230
236
241
247
252
-
257
262
267
,
275
- Á ÁLA
282
286
MIROSLAV MACÁK1 2
1
2
s
o
o
1
-
–
A B
s
2
(1) 40 7820
- -12 -
-
Zdroj: www.deere.sk
–
3
-
A B
s
4
s –
5
-
-
– –
– –
6
s
7
-
- - – - - -
--
- – -
–
-- - - - - -
- - - -- -
–
- - - - - MCMAHON
8
s
9
-
s
v o
s
10
- -
-
11
-
s -
1- - -
- - --
Z
s
Z
12
–
13
-
-
-
-
- v
12500j 314 54,03 17,18 2,67 1,08 40,37 93/7 3,4
14
Z
V
Z
Z s
Navrhování lanových chmelnicových konstrukcí. - - - -
Vollautomatische Aufhängerung der Aufleitdrähte in Hopfen-Hochgerüsten. Landtechnik-Agricultural Engineering, –
- - Engineering Principles of Agricultural Machines.
- - - Rostlinná výroba IV. - - -
– -
15
-
s
-
-
-
16
--
-
-
-
17
-
- - ,
, , , , , ,
Salix viminalisHelianthus tuberosus Sida hermaphrodita Spartina
pectinata Rosa multiflora Polygonum sachalinenseMiscanthus sinensis gigantean
-
- s-1
-1
-
- - -
o
-
-
-
18
h U 2
p U - 2 h U - p -
s
19
-
Vnnp
z – - , mnp – mn – V –
S
z – - , m – h – S – 2, h –
,
kN
, 12
,
s,
s, , p - , h - , A - , BC HI - ,
, , - , - - I –
2 12 22
p
A
B C H I
20
BC HI
s ,
- -
- p-
1 1
2
A×B A×C
B×C 1
2 2
A×B×C > 2
On
levels ,
,
21
-
- -
Rose
- -
1 2
- - - -
Rose
s s
1 2
-
22
s - s
- - - –
- - ,
- s - - – , -
-
on ,
-
, ,
-
, , even
C s,
p - , h -
s
p - , h -
2 12 22
p
p
2 12 22
p
p
2 12 22
p
p
2 12 22
p
p
23
-
p - , h -
C p -
, h -
, ,
-
-
- -
-
-
2 12 22
p
p
2 12 22
p
p
24
- o - - ,
Rose
,
,
s,
,
,
, s, no
Energia odnawialna,
- ISBN - - -
- - -
Theoretical analysis of the compression of fibrous agricultural materials,
- -
- -
- - -
25
-
Produkcja granulatu i brykietów w aspekcie cech
- Comminution properties of biomass
in forage harvester and beater mill and its particle size characterization- -
– – –
-
-
, – -,
- - -
26
IVO CELJAK, VÁCLAV VÁVRA, MILAN FRÍD, JOSEF FROLÍK
Abstract:
-3
Keywords:
Z
-
populus nigra L. x populus maximowiczii J- -
–
- V -
27
-
–
-
-
populus maximowiczii x populus berolinensis populus nigra L. x populus maximowiczii J-
populus maximowiczii x populus berolinensis
populus nigra L. x populus maximowiczii J- -
-
- -
3
3 3
-3
- -
- -
- -
28
-
-1)
hmoty s obsahem
-1)
Populus maximowiczii x populus berolinensis
Populus nigra L. x populus maximowiczii J-
Populus nigra L. x populus maximowiczii J-
-
- , -
- -1 20 -1 -1
-
3
3
-
- -
– -3
M
- - -X
- - -
-
29
-
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
:
30
2
MIROSLAV MACÁK, LADISLAV MARIÁN
- -
- -
,
Vo
31
-
- - -
– – – –
–
–
–
3 -
32
-
Ø
-
2
V
33
-
-
– – – – – – –
– - – – –
V
-3 - -3
CO
– V
34
V
Z – - -
- -
Štatistický parameter Hodnoty emisií CO2, mol.m-2.s-1
pred spracovaním pôdy po spracovaní pôdy Stredná hodnota 5.445 5.416 Chyba strednej hodnoty 0.172 0.157 Medián 5.64 5.145 Smerodajná odchýlka 0.687 1.354 Rozptyl výberu 0.472 1.834
-0.907 4.881 -0.542 1.763
Minimálna hodnota 4.08 3.44 Maximálna hodnota 6.26 11.36
87.12 400.75 16 74
Z
- - - -
V
35
-
- -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- -
– - -
CO
36
37
-
-
- - -
L
- - - - -
-
- - - - - –
- - -
- –
-
- -
- - - - -
38
LL
– JÁN SIMONÍK
_______________________________________________________________________
správnou intenzitou Intenzita mm
R
39
-
,.
.1.100 n
mi
n
mi
SiVi
ViViSiCuH %
,.
n
mi
n
mi
Si
SiViV
CuH - n - i -
Vi - - Si - - V - [Vi -V] -
– -
BAUER Linestar 168 LL
40
3 - - –
3 N -
41
-
-
V
-V -VI
Výsledok CuH, % 86,94
Vi -V -VI
Výsledok CuH, % 76,73
Pole 1 2 3 4 5 7 Prvé
meranie
Druhé meranie
42
– -
33
43
-
Parameter
Stredná hodnota, mm
Smerodajná odchýlka, mm Rozdiel max – min, mm
Minimum, mm Maximum, mm
(95,0%)
V
AL- – – –
-
- -
– – –
-- -
-
- -
-
44
– – -
- - -
--
- - LET
- - –
R – SIMONÍK
- SIMONÍK
- – -
-
- - – T
, , ,
45
-
JÁ *,
* ,
Abstract:
-
-
- -
-
h
46
-
, ,
333
- -
–
47
-
-
-
-
- -
-
- -
48
-- -
-
-
-
-
- - --
-
F
-
–
-
-
49
-
-
L
EMÁNEK, - -
- -
- - -
Savremena poljoprivredna tehnika - -
In Doktorska dizertacija - , ,
- J , FIN
, - , ,
- VITÁZEK, I -
EK, V
dresa:
, -
50
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TILLAGE AND SOIL MOISTURE IN VINEYARD INTERROWS WHEN USING AVAILABLE FARM MECHANIZATION
BARBORA BADALÍKOVÁ1 2
1Agricultural Research, Ltd. Troubsko, Czech Republic 2
Abstract: Possibilities of vineyard interrow tillage and application of crushed grapevine chips
(Czech Republic) within the period of 2008 – 2010. Altogether three experimental variants were analysed from the viewpoint of their effects on water retention and the content of soil moisture. The obtained results indicate that variants with organic material either incorporated into the soil or used as mulching material retained more soil moisture than control (i.e. without organic matter). This means that the incorporation of crushed grapevine chips into the soil increases its infiltration capacity and improves the retention of soil moisture for a longer time interval. Keywords: soil moisture, grapevine chips, soil tillage INTRODUCTION As far as the water content is concerned, the method of tillage is very important because it contributes to the establishment of either positive or negative soil water regime. Both infiltration and antigravitation movement of water in soil can be regulated by changes in or modificaton of the soil environment so that it is possible to control the overall soil water regime. Although a deeper tillage reduces surface runoff in the spring season and assures higher water reserves in soil, it also reduces the reserve of productive water and this shows a negative effect on growth and development of plants during periods of reduced precipitations and/or draught. By tillage we can therefore influence the soil water regime, i.e. not only its infiltration but also the redistribution and preservation of wataer
s also possible to influence the soil drainage Matula (2003) found out that tillage plaid a
siginificant role in changes of hydrophysical soil properties and, above all, in the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksatconditions principially influence all systems of soil cultivation. The basic objective of tillage operations is to maintain an optimum level of soil moisture on the one hand and a good supply of cultivation measures are performed above all with the aim to kill and liquidate weeds and the interrupt soil capilarity by disruption of the soil surface layer. As already mentioned by many authors, it is well-known that the reserve of productive water is dependent on the content of organic matter in soil because it has a high retention capacity and can retain water for longer time intervals. This means that it is quite necessary to process and recycle all residues of organic matter. At present, there are various methods of crushing and mulching of woody residues, which can either remain on the soil surface or be incorporated into the top layer of the soil horizon y it is therefore possible to improve the water-binding capacity of soil and to alleviate the densification and compaction of subsoil. The incorporation of grapevine chips into the soil is one of possible methods how to supply organic matter into soil and how to maintain soil
grapevines t, the most usual method of grapevine treatment was to remove it from interows and burn it in vain outside the
51
M -
crushing directly in interrows and recyclation either as mulching material or as a source of
years, this incorporation is beneficial and increases the stability of soil texture even after the movement of mulching machinerincrease the retention capacity of soil. The incorporation of any kind of organic matter into soil thus enables not only to maintain the crumbly soil texture with a great number of valuable aggregations but also to improve the retention capacity due to the formation of numerous pores and micropores (Duvigneaud, 1998; Burg The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of incorporated organic material (i.e. crushed woody canes) on soil humidity. MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY Within the period of 2008 – 2010, possibilities of soil cultivation in vineyards situated in wine-investigated with regard to incorporation of cane woody chips into the soil surface layer. Altogether three experimental variants were established in each locality to evaluate the effect of grapevine chips on physical, chemical and biological properties of soil. The content of water in soil was assessed and evaluated in all three experimental variants.
Variant 1 – Control, without incorporation of woody grapevine chips Variant 2 – grapevine (chips) into the depth of 0.10 m Variant 3 – Crushed grapevines (chips) + grass left on the soil surface as mulching material The minimum total length of each variant was 100 m; their width corresponded with the distance between individual rows. s sampled from two depths, viz. 0 – 0.15 and 0.10 – were taken from three depths, viz 0 – 0.10, 0.10 – 0.20 and 0.20 – 0.30 m. All samplings were performed at the beginning and to the end of the growing season.
Thereafter they were dried at 105 0C for 8 hours, cooled and weighed again. The weight percentage of water content was calculated using weights of fresh and dry soil samples. Charcteristics of both experimental localities The wine-growing municipality is situated in the maize-growing region and belongs into the warm and dry climatic region. The altitude is up to 200 m and soils are classified as chenozem developed on the loessial subsoil, with loam to clay-loam texture and a marked proportion of dust particles. The wine-growing municipality is also situated in the maize-growing region and belongs into the warm and dry climatic region. The altitude here is also up to 200 m and soils are classified as alluvial fluvisols with loam to sand-loam texture. . RESULTS AND DISCUSSION After winter pruning, the woody grapevines can be liquidated using a number of
Burg, 2010); after the treatment they are usually carried away. These technologies, however, are mostly rather expensive and result in the export and subsequent defficiency of valuable organic matter. The incorporation of organic matter in the form of cane chips increases the value of soil structure coefficient and this then results in a reduced risk of
52
Data about soil recorded in individual variants of grapevine recycling in the locality
within its profile and there were also changes in idnvidual variants at the beginning and to the end of the growing season. An increase in soil moisture in the middle and bottom soil layer was observed in Variant 2 while in the control Variant 1 it was increased in near the surface. This was caused by the mulch layer, which protected the soil against too intensive drying off (above all at the beginning of the growing season). Differences between individual years were affected by the annual course of weather. individual variants were rather similar. Decreased contents of soil humidity were observed in upper soil layers in all experimental variants; this was caused above all by the sand-loam texture of soil. Also the content of soil humidity was lower than in 2009, particularly low precipitations were manifested also in a decrease in soil humidity,
ol (Variant 1), a decrease in soil humidity was recorded in both experimental localities. Table 1 – – 2010)
Table 2 – – 2010)
Trends of average contents of soil water in individual experimental variants in the
regression equations indicate higher soil moisture contents in Variant 2 (i.e. with crushed
were observed in Variant 3 (with crushed grapevines mixed with grass), and in Variant 2. udy perioed were
different soil types and partly also by the locality. The course of trend flowlines was similar and the regression equations indicated in Variants 2 and 3 similar contents of soil moisture. This can be explained by the fact that incorporated grapevine chips function wirhin the soil profile as a source of organic matter
Beginning of the growing season growing season
Beginning of the growing season growing season
Beginning of the growing season growing season
0.0-0.10 7.78 16.38 19.680.10-0.20 15.12 16.13 10.02 10.65 16.93 20.780.20-0.30 18.37 15.01 19.170.0-0.10 17.89 13.31 7.72 22.200.10-0.20 16.80 11.80 16.76 20.160.20-0.30 19.25 11.30 12.08 19.780.0-0.10 19.55 16.19 8.13 19.900.10-0.20 15.33 16.25 9.87 18.220.20-0.30 17.55 17.65 10.23 20.23
1
2
3
2010
weight % weight %
2009
weight %
Variant depth(m)
2008
Beginning of the growing season growing season
Beginning of the growing season growing season
Beginning of the growing season growing season
0.0-0.10 19.07 17.08 8.26 13.90 11.060.10-0.20 19.13 17.15 11.07 6.12 13.83 12.370.20-0.30 19.05 17.60 6.16 13.31 12.100.0-0.10 8.12 5.05 11.570.10-0.20 19.22 20.13 11.56 6.65 15.11 12.810.20-0.30 18.67 12.66 7.85 13.790.0-0.10 19.87 7.26 16.92 9.190.10-0.20 20.05 11.38 5.27 15.67 10.720.20-0.30 20.32 19.83 12.33 5.78 13.68 10.77
1
2
3
Variant depth(m)
2008 2009 2010
weight % weight % weight %
53
M -
so that it enables a good infiltration and a long-term retention of water. Organic matter not only shows a positive effect on the content or soil moisture but also on the resistency of soil to compaction.
Figure 1 – Trend of soil humidity content in individual years
and different experimental variants –
Figure 2 – Trend of soil humidity content in individual years
and different experimental variants –
of presence of organic matter in soils exposed to the compaction caused by the movement of heavy machinery on the soil surface. Use of machinery for the cultivation of vineyards is important not only with regard to the extension of the age of vineyards but also from the viewpoint of maintenance of the soil fertility and yielding capacity. Machinery for cultivation of interrows is used for weed killing, application of mineral fertiisers and green manure, and destruction of the surface crust (to improve the infiltration capacity of soil). This destruction can be done with skive cultivators, disk stubble ploughs and/or rotary cultivators. Deep cultivation, soil loosening, and aeration of soil horizon can be done with heavy blade cultivators and deep tillers. Orgamic matter can be incorporated into the soil also by means of spade ploughs and and
Variant 1: y = 8.073x2 - 30.84x + 38.81R² = 1
Variant 2: y = 6.947x2 - 26.95x + 37.57R² = 1
Variant 3: y = 5.624x2 - 21.53x + 32.77R² = 1
0,00
5,00
10,00
15,00
20,00
25,00
2008 2009 2010
wei
ght %
1
2
3
Polyg. (1)
Polyg. (2)
Polyg. (3)
Variant 1: y = 7.472x2 - 32.59x + 43.30R² = 1
Variant 2: y = 7.959x2 - 34.81x + 46.43R² = 1
Variant 3: y = 8.772x2 - 38.74x + 50.11R² = 1
0,00
5,00
10,00
15,00
20,00
25,00
2008 2009 2010
wei
ght %
1
2
3
Polyg. (1)
Polyg. (2)
Polyg. (3)
54
ay it can be assured that the soil environment will be destroyed for at least.. CONCLUSIONS Results of these experiments enabled to evaluate effects of grapevine chips
localities with different soil conditions within the period of 2008 – altogether three variants (i.e. control, incorporation of organic matter into the soil, and its applicaton on the soil surface). The obtained results indicated that Variants 2 and 3 with incorporated organic matter and mulching, respectively, were able to retain more moisture than control Variant 1 (i.e. without the application of grapevine chips). This means that organic matter showed a positive effect on soil humidity in both experimental localities. The incorporation of crushed grapevine enables a good infiltration of water into the soil and its retention for a longer time interval.
National Agency of Agricultural Research, Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. References:
– -
978-80-87091-06-7
s. 20- -80-552-0380-5
- -6013
characteristics of soils.
, Praha, 2009, s.50- -80-213-1897-7 . 2., 1998, Vyd. Praha Academia
. Reiskirchen.
Plant
49 –306
- -80- -31-8. 1.vyd. Olomouc, 2010, 220 s.
-80-87091- -2 Contact address:
Republic, e- [email protected]
55
M -
KLIZNI TRVALÝCH TRAVNÍCH
AV VÁVRA
Abstrakt:
Na louce s
ale je
.
na 50 dB. K -
-12 dB nebo obsahuje-- -5dB.
C
i a jeho i
-
--
j
–sluc
56
tzv. „AeqT
n
i
LiTeqA
itT
L1
.1,0, 10..1log10 [dB], (1)
LAeq,T T[s], ti i [s]; n
trv
s MATERIÁL A METODIKA
d
n z eza
stej
M
mikrofonem a zesilova em. Funkci a
Nam
soupravy.
57
M -
rychlos -1600-z Tab. 1 –
tlak teplota
vzduchu vzduchu rychlost
v tru sm r v tru
1013 hPa 75 % 2 m.s-1
M byla
pozemku.
hluku (
- (1 -
VÝSLEDKY A DISKUZE Stanovišt
- 2:
okra
ekjsou vyobrazeny v grafu
3:
51,7 dB (viz tab. 2 hodnota v
tit. Z
58
Tab. 2 –
[m] hladina [dB]
1 1 - - 37,5 2 1 8 97,8 37,5 3 2 - - 39,1 2 50 67,1 39,1
5 2 58,0 39,1 6 2 165 51,1 39,1 7 3 - - 8 3 300 9 3 313
10 - - 11 8 12 38 77,3
4:
s
59
M -
asov promAeqT
- -2(2009).
Obr.2 - od zdroje hluku – eza
Obr. 3 -
3 lost intenzity hluku
graf na ku ).
0
20
40
60
80
100
1201 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 103
109
115
121
127
133
139
145
151
157
163
169
175
181
313
165
104
5038
88 2,61218,92842,763,960,3
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
60
-
koeficientem P
ZÁV R
(louky s
prostor staveb a chr
sklizni p sobil pouze
k
v
modifier of the relation between noise annoyance and incidence of ischaemic heart disease. London, 2003, vol.60, s.739-
-0711
R2
0
20
60
80
100
120
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
61
M -
– Ausgewählte Kapitel.
-3-8169-2788- -201-0020-
2
-7071-185-X. -01-01306-5.
-901936-2-5
-300-11.12.01-
-1 Akustika –
-2 Akustika –
-prostredi/zakladni-informace-o-monitorovani-hluku
(8.3.2011)
:
62
Abstrakt:
republiky
ÚVOD
M
vzduchu. K povrchu chodby. V
s
MATERIÁL A METODY
k
63
M -
2
s 2
do hodby byla
m.s-1
je, kde kejda
s
Koncentr -
VÝSLEDKY A DISKUSE
3
film na povrchu chodby.
Obr. 1 – Graf koncentrace amoniaku
koncentrace NH
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
22.6.10 22.6.10 22.6.10 22.6.10 22.6.10 22.6.10 22.6.10 22.6.10
konc
entr
ace
NH
(m
g.m
)
64
Z
kg.ks-1.rok-1. 30 – –
lopatou po povrch
hale s
-3. Graf koncentrace amoniaku z
Obr. 2 –
-3 .
KONCENTRACE AMONIAKU
0.002.004.006.008.00
10.0012.0014.0016.0018.0020.00
konc
entr
ace
NH
(mg.
m)
65
M -
Obr. 3 –
Z t
Obr. 3 –
-3. Z
KONCENTRACE AMONIAKU
0.002.004.006.008.00
10.0012.0014.0016.0018.0020.00
11:00 11:10 11:20
konc
entr
ace
NH
(mg.
m)
KONCENTRACE AMONIAKU
0.002.004.006.008.00
10.0012.0014.0016.0018.0020.00
10:10 10:20 10:40 11:00
konc
entr
ace
NH
(mg.
m)
66
Z
pro chov skotu. Z
z
:
NÁVAROVÁ 3
2001, s. 59–62. , J., G.J.,
-388
, ,
– , e- [email protected] , [email protected]
67
M -
TNOSTÍ
Abstrakt:
komp
vlastnosti
ÚVOD
by si kompost zasluhoval. Jednou z
k
kompost s MATERIÁL A METODY
.
ky.
vlhkost. (20
) Z suroviny
2
a
68
v cesu,
[kg.m-3], pórovitost [%],
V
.
aj v – kg.m-3
1) 3
vlhkosti. 2)
.
3) z
321 ....
mkgVn
mmmm n
v (1)
m1, m2 n – n – –] mv – -3] V – [m3]
69
M -
Pórovitost surovin, resp.
v
komp
v rozme-
mog en i t y
-li tyto suroviny ve fo
na jejich
roz
-
1) 3
vlhkosti.
70
2) kompresorem.
3) 1
5) p2 6)
%1002
21
pppM (2)
p1 – p2 – 7)
8) 9) 10)
L
1,3,5 – 2 –
– 6 – vstup od kompresoru, 7 – 8 –
pórovitosti surovin
i kompostu, p
suroviny v
– Vlhkost je stanovena z
na d
71
M -
velikost ok 5×5 mm. Z s
exsik
%100
1001
2
mmm
x V (3)
m1 – m2 – mV –
. K
( 3).
Obr. 3 - 50
V
4).
-
72
V
– v
pr
V
pórovitost, vlhkost surovin,
Vzhledem k
Z
VÝSLEDKY A DISKUZE
1)
2)
3) .
73
M -
74
75
M -
76
stabilizovanou organickou hmotu s
k
nedostatkem humusu s
vlastnosti. K –
www.vuzt.eu dispozici metodika
v tomto v
NAZV „
A. PLÍVA. P. – . -
-211. -80-552-0380-5.
PLÍVA. P.: . [Where it is possible to compost in belt piles]. -26 -2391.
University of Wisconsin-Madison, March 29, 2002 PLÍVA. P. .
-80-86726-32-8.
- -23-X
161 01 Praha 6 – 022 www.vuzt.cz, [email protected]
161 01 Praha 6 – www.vuzt.cz, [email protected]
77
M - Zvláštní vydání
MIROSLAV KAVKA, VÁCLAV CINIBURK. MIROSLAV MIMRA
t
M, H T
M 1
H 1 T –
1 .
A. V
4.
6.
- - ].
- ; l.t- ].
- - ]
78
–
- - ]. - - ]
– - - -
PU – -
- - ]. –
- - ]. 4. HZ –
- - ].
a b t
Z
Z –
– –
4.
z
79
M - Zvláštní vydání
- - ]
- ] - ]
- ]
- ]
h*ha
-1
CHO
H
M
-1
CHO
H
M
-1
CHO
HM
-1
CHO
HM
*ha-1
CHO
H
M
*-1
CHO
H
M
80
- - ]
VN ONVN ZM
VN ONVN ZM
VN ONVN ZM
*ha
-1
H M H M H M H M
VN ON VN ZM VN
CHO
*-1
H M H M H M H M
VN ON VN ZM VN PH VN S
CHO
VN ONVN ZM
VN ONVN ZM
81
M - Zvláštní vydání
- - ] 6.
–
–
V
v
L ABRHAM, Z.,
–
HAVRLAND, B. - . -
VN ONVN ZM
*ha-1
VN PU HZ
HM
*-1
VN PU HZ
HM
82
KAVKA, M. – CINIBURK, V., -
. AGRIC. ECON. – CZECH, –
–.
-
-
, , -
83
M - Zvláštní vydání
V
z
v
v
M , PM
- -
v -
PM v –
84
v – –
.
- -
S
S
z . Z
–
–
V
v
1 2 3 4
6 7
85
M - Zvláštní vydání
- -3
m3 -1 PM10 PM PM10 PM
1 2 664 3 4 68 89
6 7 648
-
v
- - -1 -1
10
1 2 3 4
6 7
- -
V v
. V -- –
- - -
-
-
PM -
86
Z -
W.,
- - R,K.M., MUNILLA,R.D., WILLIAMS,C.M., SCHIFFMAN,S.S.
(
- CHARDON,W.J., - - -
,
- VAN LEEUWEN,R.F.X.,
-
-
886 -
87
M - Zvláštní vydání
–
–
–
V
– –
–
ny v
– -T2
K
88
v
–
-
–
( - -
84
–
–
( - –
–
–
-
-
89
M - Zvláštní vydání
–
–
–
–
– ECOWOOD
90
–
PLÍVA, P., LAURIK, S.
[
. ISBN - -86884- -
PLÍVA, P.
– PLÍVA, P., [
- - - - - -
PLÍVA, P. - - - -8.
–
–
91
M - Zvláštní vydání
v
.
92
(
–
93
M - Zvláštní vydání
v
=gradr0div - [- [V]
-
0
z
1
1 dlgradU
C
U
-
94
V
–
z
95
M - Zvláštní vydání
- –
- -
–
– 6.
-
–
–
-
-
OSMAN, A. M., SAVOIE, P., GRENIER, D., -
- - -
- - -9.
-–
–
-
- –
96
-
--
- - -< >.
- -
– -
97
M - Zvláštní vydání
V
MILAN FRÍD, VÁCLAV VÁVRA, IVO CELJAK, JOSEF FROLÍK
,
-
®.
98
99
M - Zvláštní vydání
®.
Z
149 434 139 194 169 877 -
-
341 961 1235
11
®
®.
®
100
K
v
v
;
. ; ;
101
M - Zvláštní vydání
U
OCHÁZKA,
-
–
v
102
X
-
-
-
dy.
,
103
M - Zvláštní vydání
– –
-
4 ****
****
****
****
104
.
Z í ly
í
–
105
M - Zvláštní vydání
.
–
–
-
4 ****
****
**** ****
****
106
9.
,
–
BENGOUGH A.G., MULLI–
-
-
,
, -
107
M - Zvláštní vydání
PZ
GEODIS BRNO
- -
v
v
108
--
- -
48
– -- –
-
-
109
M - Zvláštní vydání
Z-
<
110
FERWERDA, J. G., SKI GA, O.
- GOJDA, M HABOUDANE, D., MILLE E., ZARCO- CHAN, I. B
– S, E. & DE BAERDEMAEKER, J
- -94.
ZHANG, P., ANDERSON, B. - -
- -
111
M - Zvláštní vydání
POROVNÁNÍ TECHNOLOGI
– – – –
-
-
ÚVOD
Z
v
- v MATERIÁL A
112
- - - Setí -
-
– - – - - - - - -
– e – –
–
A DISKUZE – -
– -
-
- Z
-
[ - ]
[ - ]
[ - ] ce
[ - ] 4
3. 5
113
M - Zvláštní vydání
-
Z
- v
-
T
[ - ]
[ - ]
[ - ] [ - ]
4
3.
-
[ - ]
[ - ]
[ - ]
[ - ]
4. Z
Z –
– -
114
- -
-
-
- ]
- ]
-
]
[ - ] 3
3. 3
-
- -
–
–
–
v - - - -
- - -
115
M - Zvláštní vydání
-
116
RESEARCH OF CORRELATION BETWEEN ELECTRIC D
all
-
INTRODUCTION
-
-
a
-
117
M - Zvláštní vydání
- -
2 - Me
- - -
– –
-
R = V.I-1(r)
ohm.m r = 2 d R = 2 d V/I d m C = 1/ R
ohm-1 = siemens c = 1/ r ohm-1 m-1 = siemens m-1
c = 1/ (2 d R) = I / (2 d V) -
t
118
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
– – – –
-
mean standardized root-mean-square standardized
2 - –
]]
]]
]]
- –
]]
119
M - Zvláštní vydání
4 - – – –
- – –
– – –
le 3 - –
3 - – -
120
le 4 - -
]]
]]
le - -
– – – –
– – – – – –
and
121
M - Zvláštní vydání
– – – –
– – – –
– – –
– – – –
- – – –
122
- – –
-
CONCLUSION
- -
n
– -
–
123
M - Zvláštní vydání
–
–
-
–
–
–
–
–
–
– -
- -
–
–
–
-
-
-
-
124
V V
-
-
ÚVOD
-
125
M - Zvláštní vydání
–
- -
- -
-
-
- -
-
19,1 19,2 20,618,9 18,7 20,418,5 18,3 18,7
234
4 24
126
-
- -
- - - - - -
- -
127
M - Zvláštní vydání
-
ep. na
3 ) ) ) ) )
2322
34
3332
4
32
24
128
- 2010
2432
4
3
22342
2333
- -
129
M - Zvláštní vydání
- -
- -
- L
– - - - -
-
-
- -
-
-- -2 - -
-
- - - - -
- -
-
- -
e-
130
2
2
ÚVOD
Praze -
–
–
131
M - Zvláštní vydání
-
-
-
K D3
K v - - z
- ]
sady
132
–
-3]
- - -
- - - - 2 - -
- - -
v
K
–
D3 – D2
D1 K
-
-3]
133
M - Zvláštní vydání
–
D1 a D2.
-3]
- – –
-3]
- – –
d - -
134
K
- -–
–
-
–
-
135
M - Zvláštní vydání
2 2Z
-
ÚVOD
- – -
- - - -
-– 4
v - -
136
v -
-
-3 --3
- -3
- -
- .
-
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
)
mm
)
rok 2008 rok 2009 rok 2010
137
M - Zvláštní vydání
-
-
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
)
mm
)
rok 2008 rok 2009 rok 2010
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
)
mm
)
rok 2008 rok 2009 rok 2010
138
-
-
-3
z- -
e v v
2
3
4 var 2var 3
139
M - Zvláštní vydání
- -
- - - -
-
140
HODNOCENÍ KVALITY ZP ZÁVISLOSTI NA ROVNOM
Abstrakt:
ÚVOD
-
-
141
M -
MATERIÁL A METODY
142
-
-
- - - - - - - - - - 5 5 - -
[g.m
-2]
- - - - - - - - - - 5 5 - -
[g.m
-2]
143
M -
-
-
-
144
-
-
-
145
M -
-
-
:
146
:
-
-
-
--
-
147
M -
Abstrakt
ÚVOD
–
–
MATERIÁL A METODY
–
- -
148
–
– –
-
- - - -
–
- +-
- - -
149
M -
–
–
–
- -
150
–
-
- - - -5
J - < -
- - - --
–
[kW
h.kg
-1]
151
M -
INDIKÁTORY VODNÍ ERO
Abstract:
ÚVOD
MATERIÁL A METODY
152
–
-
-
–
-
-
–
- -
-
153
M -
- -
-
-
154
-
-
– –
155
M -
-
-
- -
-
156
-
-
157
M -
- - -
-
- -
-
- - -
-
-
158
NASADENIA TRAKTORA MONITOROVACIEHO SYST NA BÁZE GPS
Abstrakt
ÚVOD
- I
.
-
–
MATERIÁL A METÓDY
159
M -
-
S -
– –
– – –
–
– -
– O
– -
–
– O
160
– – –
S –
–
h ha Parcela
– -1
- - -
161
M -
–
–
T1 T3A T3B T3C T3D T3E T3F T3 T6A T6B T6 TS
162
–
–
163
M -
–
–
-1 km.h-1
S
- - -
–
–
164
-
–
ZÁVER
– – – –
T136,20 %
T352,10 %
T611,70 %
165
M -
L
- -
–
– - - -
– – –
- - - -
- -- - - - -
– - - - -
- - -
. - -
– - - -
– -
– - - -
-
166
Abstrakt:
-
ÚVOD
- -
–
MATERIÁL A METODY
- -
-
167
M -
-
-
– - - -
- - --
168
-
169
M -
-
5 -
170
-
5
55
-
171
M -
R
-
:
-
- - - - -
- - - -
- - -
– - -
172
SVOZ
Abstract:
ÚVOD
MATERIÁL A METODY
173
M -
- -
- - -
- -
- - - S
–
1000celková
mqq
BRO zeleBROzele
zele
mqS
174
–
Obec
[ha]
-1]
BRKO - min.
-1]
BRKO - max.
-1]
Celkem 39 228 756 11 340
–
Obec
Ø
-1]
BRKO celkem
-1]
[ha]
[t k1]
BRO
celkem 1]
Celkem 17 30 776
175
M -
–
Obec VOK stabilní
Celkem 26ks
–
-
–
176
L :
- - - - – –
- - - -
sa:
- - -
- - -
177
M -
STEBIEL NA ENERGETIC ELY A NIEKTORÉ POZNATKY PRI ICH SPA
Abstrakt:
ÚVOD
–
-
MATERIÁL A METÓDY
178
Menert- Šali
18 % 38 %
TESTO 350 M/XL
179
M -
C –
– –
-
- -
180
181
M -
-
-
-
-
–
2
–
182
NO2
183
M -
ZÁVER
L
– –
–
- - -
– – -
- - - - - –
- - - -
- -
– – –
184
185
M - Zvláštní vydání
POROVNANIE KVALITY P
PAVOL FINDURA, JAN TURAN*, PAVEL ZEMÁNEK* *, ONDREJ KURUC, MARCEL PRÍSTAVKA
S
Z
v
-
,
–
pFINDURA
HEUSSER
- -
NOZDROVICKÝ
MATERIÁL A
Z
s
186
A. B.
- - -
v –
187
M - Zvláštní vydání
-
p
- - - - - -
-
- - o o
188
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
-
v v
A
B
189
M - Zvláštní vydání
- - -
-
á
PRED PO PRED PO VPRED VPO
-
po - po
, Vpo
s po
190
T1 T1
T1T2 T2T2
R R
R
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
8 10 12
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
25 75 125
- – o, T – o, R –
– -
-
k
191
M - Zvláštní vydání
ZÁVER
Z
v – -
Z
-
- - -
- - - - -
--
kvalitu podmítky – -
–
- -
- - - - - -
, Slovenská
192
NA
k
K
-
od
193
M - Zvláštní vydání
-
- 4
ek
- -
v
ní
UV
-
k
-
194
- -
- – - DC
– -
v
k
ste
-
195
M - Zvláštní vydání
- –
0,005,00
10,0015,0020,0025,0030,0035,0040,0045,0050,0055,0060,0065,00
0 1 2 3 4 5
Zast
oupe
ní [%
]
196
- –
Z
v
- –
0,00
5,00
10,00
15,00
20,00
25,00
30,00
35,00
40,00
45,00
50,00
55,00
0 1 2 3 4 5
Zast
oupe
ní [%
]
197
M - Zvláštní vydání
- –
- – vysoká k
198
- –
v
v
- -- -
-
- -
199
M - Zvláštní vydání
-
, –
- -
200
–
MILAN KROULÍK , MARTIN DLOUHÝ , JAN
- -
-
S
-
–
-
201
M - Zvláštní vydání
-
-
-
-
-
-
Moto L Moto R Co p ss
Systen ent
D spl y,eepe D t l I O
Sp ye
Son
CAN - RSonve te
M n o p te, L n
IP e L se s neS k LMS
CANopen RS
Et
ene
t
Et
ene
t
US
B
US
B
PS T k n n tSM
202
- - - - - -
-
-
203
M - Zvláštní vydání
–
nd
on -
- - -
-- - - -
-
- - - -
S,
204
-- - - -
,
205
M - Zvláštní vydání
THE USE OF AGRICULTURAL WASTE FOR BIOGAS PRODUCTION ON THE EXAMPLE OF MODEL INDIVIDUAL FARMS
l
INTRODUCTION
206
–
Source: author’s design
–
Pa
[%] 8 – –
[% DM]
68 – – – – 86 –
N [% DM] – – – 6 – NH4 [% DM] – – – – P2O5 [% DM] – – – – K2O [% DM] – – – –
– – Source: author’s elaboration based on [4]
-
-
207
M - Zvláštní vydání
- -
-
–
-
-
–
-
·t-
- –
6 Source: author’s elaboration based on [16]
- - -
- -
208
–
4
%
·t- ·t-
8 – – – –
– 86 – – –
68 – – –
– – – – Chicken
– – –
– – – – – – – – –
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Source: author’s elaboration based on [4, 12]
·t-
-
209
M - Zvláštní vydání
–
Source: author’s elaboration based on [4, 12] RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
= = 1
–
– A – -
– - –
= log 1+log (1+ ) –
210
- --
-
-
= +
– – -
- -
·d-
-
- - - -
- - - - -
- - -
- - - - -
– –
211
M - Zvláštní vydání
– ·d-
·t- ·t- ·t-
= . . . . . –
– - –
212
– –
–
·t-
·t-
86
Source: author’s elaboration based on [4, 12]
–
- - ·t- -
-
-
213
M - Zvláštní vydání
–
Source: author’s design
CONCLUSION
-
-
-
-
-
-
–
-
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
m3/t·year
Pig manure
Pig manure + maize silage
Maize silage + sugar beet
Pig manure + maize silage + sugar beet
214
–
–
– –
- -
–
-
-
-
-
-
- -
- -
215
M - Zvláštní vydání
POLISH CONDITIONS
Ktech - - Kmat - - Kagr - - Kpal - - Kr - - Eek - Kpr - - Cbu - - - pbu - - Ps - - Etech - - Emat - - Eagr - - Epal - - Er - - Eee - Eprod - - Eprz - - INTRODUCTION
-
216
-
-
-- –
- - - - -
-
- - -
- - -
rpalagrmattech KKKKK -
pr
bubu
pr
sek K
CpKPE
-
--
rpalagrmattech EEEEE -
prod
przee E
EE
217
M - Zvláštní vydání
-- - – -
- -
- -
- - - - -
- -
- - - -
–
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
-
–
-
% - % -
% -
% -
- - - -
- - - -
--
\ - - - -
-
-
218
- - - -
– -
–
- - -
- -
- -
–
- % - % - % - % - %
- - - -
- - -
- - - -
--
219
M - Zvláštní vydání
- - - -
- - - -
--
- - - - -
– - - -
- -
–
- % - % - % - % - - - - -
--
220
- -
- -
–
- % - % - % - % - %
- - - -
Table 6 – Energy efficiency ratio in the tested farms
- - -
- - - -
CONCLUSION
-
- - - -- - -
- - - -
-
-
-
221
M - Zvláštní vydání
- -
-
-
222
THE INFLUENCE OF TILCOMPACTION ER
T
Key
223
M - Zvláštní vydání
I
–
–
-
–
ptSLhVkP
V – S – t – – – - –
ohhGOGO 1
2
– -
224
– –
– –
– – – – – –
– – – - – –
– – – – – – –
– – – – - – –
– – – – –
– – – – – – – –
– – –
i
6
225
M - Zvláštní vydání
- -
– Table 1 – Characteristic of soil material
– –
% - % % %
– – –
– P – –
-
8
8
OS [kPa]
226
-8
-8
– P
P – – – P –
–
-
– -
kP [cm2]
R
R
P
227
M - Zvláštní vydání
- – -
-
– -
– – –
– P – –
WNIOSKI
-
– –
–
-
–
P
GO-3]
228
–
-
–
–
– –
– –
–
229
M - Zvláštní vydání
POLSCE H UE W LATACH 2000-2008
USE OF RENEWABLE ENE
AND IN SELECTED EU C S 2000-2008
– –
– -
–
I
I
230
– -
-
– -
-
– -
-
231
M - Zvláštní vydání
–
–
232
–
–
–
–
233
M - Zvláštní vydání
–
–
–
–
– –
234
WNIOSKI
– –
- - - - - -
- - - -
--
- -
-
235
M - Zvláštní vydání
HO
k
ÚVOD
v
–
236
–
– – – – – – -
-
237
M - Zvláštní vydání
– – – –
-
-
6
8
Z ní
y
y y
238
S - -
-
S - -
-
S - -
-
y –
y
v -
239
M - Zvláštní vydání
– –
–
R - - -
S = R =
S = R =
S = R =
6 8
--
S S S
240
HODNOCENÍ PRACOVNÍHO STROJNÍCH SOUPRAV NA
MILAN
Abstrakt:
ÚVOD
z
–
-
z
241
M -
s
-
242
s
–
–
–
s
- z
243
M -
-
Z
- s
244
-
- –
c
245
M -
Literatura:
- - -
-
–
246
Abstrakt:
ÚVOD
z
247
M -
–
3. SEKACÍ
248
VÝSLEDKY A
249
M -
á
Mk
Mk
-
250
má
Z
Z
Literatura
- - - - -
- –
- - -
- -
- - - -
- - -
251
M -
Abstract:
–
-
- - -
252
- -
-
; ; ;
ccm
I ccm
253
M -
Results
–
–
254
–
–
- N P
EM
- N P
EM
255
M -
-
– -
-
-
– ALLEN
References:
- - -
- -
- - - - -
- - -
-- - - -
256
U
Abstract: -
-
-
-
ÚVOD
-
257
M -
METODY
- - L
-
- - - - – - - –
z
–
258
–
– – – –
–
– – – –
–
– – – –
–
259
M -
– –
– –
–
-
s –
260
"
Literatura:
-
- -
–
- -
- –
- - - –
- - -
261
M -
VOST
Abstract:
– -
-
K ÚVOD
-
- – -
–
–
s Z
– -
262
-
–
–
Z
–
-
-
– -
- – – - – - – - – - – - –
-
- -
263
M -
-
– –
-
t.ha-1
(t)
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 -1
60
90
Z -
- -
- - - -
-
-
m
264
- m
- -
–
"
Literatura:
- -
- - - - -7 Z
- - -
- -- -
-
- - - -
- -
-
265
M -
–
–
z – s -
– - - - -
266
ELE PRO NÍZKOU KONSTRUKC
Abstrakt:
:
ÚVOD
-
k
-
–
267
M -
-
–
Z
1 Lze se setkat i s
268
–
–
–
– – –
269
M -
–
–
– –
–
-
270
– – – – – – –
–
–
-
271
M -
-
-
272
– – –
s
273
M -
Literatura:
- - - - -
- – -
--
-
-- -
- -
-
-
274
–
-
-
–
ÚVOD
–
METÓDY
k
275
M -
– –
276
VÝSLEDKY A
- - - - - -
-
–
P
379,2 73,2 510,8 66,30 - - - - - - - - -
277
M -
STN 490103:1998
–
278
– –
–
–
– –
279
M -
-
– -
-
-
-
-
– –
-
- --
–
–
–
–
-
280
-
–
- -
- -- -
- –
- - -- -
- -
- - -
– – – –
- - -
– – – -
-
- -
- -
- - - - -
- -
- - - -
-- - - -
-
–
281
M -
T SENSOR -
Abstract:
-
--
he
R2 0 98 R2 0 99
-
-
-
282
“
s
ON
-
-
0
5
10
15
20
25
0,00,51,01,52,02,53,03,54,0
0 5 10 15 20
Pota
toes
mas
s, k
g
Elec
tron
ic c
ircu
it o
utpu
t vol
tage
, V
Distance covered, m
Measured output voltage, V
Potatoes mass including the soil's clods, kg
283
M -
es
-
s
s
27%
73%
Pure potatoes mass, % Soil's clods, %
284
-
T
I
-
References:
–
-
0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
6,00
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Pota
toes
mas
s, k
g
Elec
tron
ic c
ircu
it o
utpu
t vol
tage
, V
Distance covered, m
Measured output voltage, VPure potatoes mass, kg
285
M -
ÝCH ECH
Abstract:
-
:
ÚVOD
–
–
A - -
–
286
- -
- -
mm
e
– –
–
– –
-
-
287
M -
-
A A A
288
–
Ze
Z
A A A
289
M -
Literatura:
-
– –
–
–
290
je komplex s , výzkum
norem
, mo- HL
: a
,
:
a
, –
: ; ;