Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks
Optical Networks
Josef Vojtěch josef.vojtech/at/cesnet.cz
Katedra počítačových systémů FIT České vysoké učení technické v Praze
© Josef Vojtěch, 2011
MI-MTI, ZS2011/12, Předn. 12 https://edux.fit.cvut.cz/MI-MTI/
Evropský sociální fond Praha & EU: Investujeme do vaší budoucnosti
MI-MTI, 2011, L. 12
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L. 12 2
Optical Networks
Outline
History
Typical Transmission Fibers
Impairments (CD, PMD, non-linearities)
WDM Transmission (WDM, DWDM, CWDM)
Amplifiers
Doped fiber – EDFA, PrDFA
Raman
SOA
SDH, OTN
Present and Future Transmission Systems
Conclusion
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L. 12 3
Back to Antiquity (mirrors, fire beacons, smoke signals) [1]
Till the end 18th century with lamps, flags
1792 – Claude Chappe with mechanical „optical“ telegraph
1830 – the advent of telegraphy
1866 – the first transatlantic cable went into operation
1876 – the invention of telephone (A.G.Bell, U.S. Patent No. 174 465)
1940 – massive increase of pairs installed - 3 MHz coax-cable system (repeater spacing 1 km), high freq. dependent loss
1948 – 4 GHz microwave system
1960 – the invention of laser (suitable transmission medium?)
1960s – optical fibre (1000 dB/km)
Optical Networks
A Little Bit of History (1)
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L. 12 4
Evolution of optical communication systems
850 nm, 1310 nm, 1550 nm
1st generation GaAs lasers 850nm, 10km regeneration
1980 – 45 Mb/s (1st generation) multi-mode fibres
2nd generation 1310 nm
1980s – 1310 nm, 1 dB/km, 100 Mb/s, multi-mode fibres
Late 1980s – 2 Gb/s, single mode fibres, repeater spacing 50 km (2nd generation)
3rd generation 1550 nm
1990s – 1550 nm (problem with lasers, dispersion of fibres, typical repeater spacing 60 -70km), 2.5 Gb/s or 10 Gb/s (3rd generation)
Optical Networks
A Little Bit of History (3)
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L. 12 5
4th generation 1550 nm – WDM - DWDM, CWDM
Optical amplification, EDFAs developed late 1980s
1990s - DWDM, optical amplification (4th generation)
Today – 10, 40 and 100G waves, 160 channels ie x Tb/s, thousands of kilometers
Optical Networks
A Little Bit of History (3)
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L. 12 6
All electromagnetic phenomena are described by Maxwell‘s equations
An optical fibre (silica or non-silica) is a nonconducting, non magnetic medium without free charges: ρ=0, J=0, M=0
Optical Networks
A Little Bit of Theory
t
BE
t
DH
0 D
0 B
PED 0
HB 0
E, H: electric/magnetic fields vectors
D, B: electric/magnetic flux densities
P: induced electric polarization
M: induced magnetic polarization
ε 0: the vacuum permittivity
μ 0: the vacuum permeability
rot
rot
div
div
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 7
Optical Networks
Optical Fibres
core: n1
cladding: n2
jacket: n0
n1 > n2 > n0
θi θr
Φ
1
2csin
n
n
Total internal reflection (discovered 1854)
Numerical aperture NA, the maximum angle of the incident ray to remain inside the core
Core: MM: 50 μm/62,5 μm, SM: 8,6 μm – 9,5 μm
Cladding: 125 μm
NAcossin ci 10 22
21 nnnn
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L. 12 8
1970: 20 dB/km (Kapron, Keck, Maurer), silica fibres
Multimode (MM) and singlemode (SM) fibres
Multimode: step-index (SI) or graded index (GI)
MM SI: modal dispersion: different rays disperse in time because of the shortest (L) and longest (L/sinΦC) paths
MM SI: 10 Mb/s
MM GI: parabolic index, lower modal dispersion, higher bit rates, 100 Mb/s
Plastic MM GI, for 1 GE (or even 10 Gb/s)
Attenuation: 1 – 4 dB/km, <10 dB/km for plastic
Optical Networks
Optical Fibres - MM
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 9
Optical Networks
Optical Fibres
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 10
Single mode (SM, Standard SMF, G.652) fibres
Supports only one so called „the fundamental mode of the fibre“, all higher modes are cut off @ the operating wavelength
An optical mode refers to a specific solution of the wave equation (satisfies boundary conditions, spatial distribution is constant as light travels along a fibre)
The cutoff wavelength is specified in ITU G.650, SM@1310 nm and 1550 nm, cutoff approx. 1200 nm
0,2 dB/km@1550 nm, 0,4 dB/km@1310 nm
Optical Networks
Optical Fibres - SM
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 11
PTx = 1 mW
PTx = 0 dBm
PRx = ??
PRx = -6 dBm
Optical Networks
Optical Powers
Tx Rx
P [dBm] = 10 log P[mW]
A = 6 dB
Attenuation coefficient
α [dB/km] = A / l
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 12
MM: Intermodal dispersion (pulse broadening, the most important limiting factor)
SM: Intermodal dispersion is absent, pulse broadening is present still because of Intramodal dispersion (or Group-velocity dispersion CD), even laser pulses have finite spectral width and pulses are modulated
CD: different spectral components of the pulse travel at different speeds
Increases as the square of the bit rate
Optical Networks
Optical Fibres – CD
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 13
D = DM + DW
Material dispersion
Waveguide dispersion
Optical Networks
Optical Fibres – CD
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 14
G.652 (SSMF): Zero dispersion at 1310 nm
G.653 (DSF): Zero dispersion at 1550 nm
G.655 (NZDSF): Small dispersion at 1550 nm, positive/negative
Dispersion-flattened fibre (DFF), positive/negative
Dispersion Compensating fibres (DCF)
Optical Networks
Optical Fibres – CD
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 15
Optical Networks Chromatic Dispersion Compensation
Typical values (receivers can have different tolerance to CD!)
Bit rate (Gbit/s)
Maximum length of G.652 link (km)
2,5 1280
10 80
40 5
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 16
Dispersion compensating fibres (DCF)
A special kind of fibre, compensates all wavelengths (the only solution for „grey“ transmitters)
Adds link loss (and money), especially for long-haul applications
Stronger non-linear effects (due to a smaller core diameter)
Fibre Bragg gratings (FBG)
Typically narrow-band elements – a stabilized DWDM laser is a must
„Wide-band“ FBGs available today (for 50 ITU DWDM channels)
Signal filtering, spectrum shaping, tuneable compensators
Cost effective solution
Electronic post and pre compensation, GTE, VIPA, MZI
Tunable
Optical Networks
Chromatic Dispersion Compensation
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 17
Optical nNtworks
Chromatic Dispersion Compensation
Chirped FBG
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 18
Optical Networks
Chromatic Dispersion Compensation (FBG)
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 19
Optical Networks
Chromatic Dispersion Compensation (FBG)
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 20
Polarization Mode Dispersion (PMD)
The stochastic phenomenon
Fibre stress, temperature, imperfections
The fundamental mode has two orthogonally polarized modes
The two components with different propagating speeds disperse along the fiber
The difference between the two propagation times is known as the Differential Group Delay (DGD)
PMD is a wavelength averaged value of DGD
Optical Networks
Optical Fibres – PMD
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 21
Optical Networks
Optical Fibres – PMD
Bit rate (Gb/s)
Maximum PMD (ps)
PMD coefficient for 400 km fibre (ps/(km)1/2)
2,5 40 2,0
10 10 0,5
40 2,5 0,125
ITU proposed PMD values
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 22
PMD is measured and quoted in ps for a particular span and discrete components but its coefficient is in ps/(km)1/2
PMD accumulates as the square root of distance of a link
A single span with high PMD dominates the total PMD for the whole network
A big issue for older fibres (late 1980s, 80 000 000 km) and higher bit rates (10 Gb/s and more)
Modern fibres have PMD of less than 0,5 ps/(km)1/2
Difficult to compensate
Optical Networks
Optical Fibres – PMD
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 23
Optical Networks
Nonlinear Optical Effects
When an intesity of elektromagnetic fields becomes too high, the response of materials becomes nonlinear
For optical systems, nonlinear effects can be both advantageous (Raman amplification) and degrading (Four Wave Mixing, Self Phase Modulation)
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 24
Optical Networks
Nonlinear Optical Effects - SRS
Stimulated Raman Scattering (SRS)
A signal is scattered by molecular vibrations of fibre – optical phonons
Can occur both in forward and backward directions
Shifted to longer wavelengths (lower energy) by 10 to 15 THz in the 1550 nm window
Wide bandwidth of about 7 THz (55 nm)
Maybe used for amplification (Raman fibre lasers), so called counter directionally pumping schemes
In DWDM systems: transfer of power from shorter wavelengths to longer ones
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 25
Optical Networks
Nonlinear Optical Effects - SBS
Stimulated Brillouin Scattering (SBS)
A signal is scattered by sound waves – acoustic phonons
Shifted to longer wavelengths (lower energy) by 11 GHz in the 1550 nm window
Narrow bandwidth of about 30 MHz
A problem for monochromatic unmodulated signals
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 26
Optical Networks
Nonlinear Optical Effects
Self-Phase Modulation (SPM)
When the intensity of the signal becomes too high, the signal can modulate its own phase
The refractive index is no longer a constant
Significant for fibres with small effective areas (G.655, DCF)
Higher bit rates (10 Gb/s and higher)
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 27
Optical Networks
Nonlinear Optical Effects (SPM1)
Pin = 16,5 dBm
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 28
Optical Networks
Nonlinear Optical Effects (SPM2)
Pin = 22,7 dBm
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L12 29
Optical Networks
Nonlinear Optical Effects (SPM3)
Pin = 25,8 dBm
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L12 30
Optical Networks Nonlinear Optical Effects (SPM4)
Pin = 30,1 dBm
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 31
Optical Networks
Nonlinear Optical Effects
Cross-Phase Modulation (CPM)
A signal modulates the phases of adjacent channels
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 32
Optical Networks
Nonlinear Optical Effects
Four Wave Mixing (FWM)
New „ghost“ signals appear in the transmission spectral range
Depends on several factors like launched powers, the CD, the refractive index, the fibre length
Severe limitations for G.653 fibres and DWDM transmissions in the 1550 nm window (C band)
Solution to this problem is to deploy L band DWDM systems (1565 nm – 1625 nm), where CD is high enough
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 33
Optical Networks
Nonlinear Optical Effects (FWM1)
Pin = 20 dBm
83 km, G.652
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 34
Optical Networks
Nonlinear Optical Effects (FWM2)
Pin = 25 dBm
83 km, G.652
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 35
Optical Networks
Nonlinear Optical Effects (FWM3)
Pin = 27 dBm
83 km, G.652
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 36
Optical Networks
Nonlinear Optical Effects (FWM4)
Pin = 30 dBm
83 km, G.652
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 37
Optical Networks
Wavelength Division Multiplex System
Basic passive principle for 2 channels over MM fibre
Still used, typically 1310+1550 nm over SMF
[11]
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 38
Optical Networks
Dense WDM = DWDM
200 GHz
100 GHz ~ 0,8 nm (C band ~ 40 channels)
50 GHz becoming standard
33 GHz submarine
[11]
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 39
Optical Networks
Transmission Systems C(coarse)WDM
+ passive, non thermally stabilized lower power consumption, less space, cheaper lasers and filters
- Limited number of channels, limited reach
Typically in MAN
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 40
Optical Networks
DWDM vs. CWDM
Parameter CWDM DWDM
Wavelength spacing 20 nm 1.6 nm (200 GHz)
0.8 nm (100 GHz)
0.4 nm (50 GHz)
The number of wavelengths 18 (G.694.2) 16-32 (metro)
40-80 (long distance)
Laser technology Uncooled DFB Cooled DFB
Bands O+E+S+C+L C+L
Filter technology Thin film Thin film, Grating, AWG
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L12 41
Optical Networks
Optical Amplifiers
Dopped fibre, Semiconductor (SOA), Raman
Erbium Doped Fibre Amplifiers (EDFA)
Really began a revolution in the telecommunications industry
Late 1980s, Payne and Kaming (University of Southampton)
OAs can directly amplify many optical signals
Protocol, bit-rate transparent
EDFAs working in the 1550 nm window (C band and later L band)
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 42
Optical Networks
Optical Amplifiers EDFA
Low energy level
High energy level, 1 μs
Metastable energy level, 10ms
980 nm 1480 nm
Er atoms
Amplified signal
Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 43
Optical Networks
Optical Amplifiers EDFA
WDM WDM
PUMP PUMP
SIGNAL SIGNAL
Forward, backward pumping
Forward: lowest noise
Backward: highest output power
980 nm: low noise
1480 nm: stronger pump sources (req. longer Er fibres)
1480 nm & backward; 980 nm & forward
Single or dual stage (for DCF)
Er doped fibre, 10 m – 100 m
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 44
Optical Networks
Optical Amplifiers EDFA
Output powers (5 Watts or more)
Gain (30 dB), is not uniform across C (L) band
Input power (- 36 dBm)
Noise Figure (NF): theoretical minimum 3 dB
ASE
For L band: long Er fibres (> 100 m)
Booster, in-line, preamplifiers
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 45
Optical Networks
Optical Amplifiers - experiments
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 46
Optical Networks
Other Optical Dopped Fibre Amplifiers
Praseodymium Doped Fluoride Fibre Amplifier (PDFA)
1310 nm, not as energy efficient compared to EDFA, higher NF
Problems with fluoride fibres, not very widespread
Thulium DFFA (TDFA)
1460 nm, 1650 nm
the lifetime problems
Neodymium DFA
1310 nm, fluoride fibre
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 47
Optical Networks
Semiconductor Optical Amplifiers
Based on conventional laser principles
Active medium (waveguide) between N and P regions
+ InGaAsP – small and compact components
+ Cost effective solutions, especially for O and S bands
+ High gain (up to 25 dB)
- Low output powers (15 dBm)
+Wide bandwidth
- High noise figure (8 dB)
-- Very short life time - cross gain effects
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2010, Př. 3 48
Optical Networks
Semiconductor Optical Amplifiers
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 49
Optical Networks
Raman Amplification
Both discrete and distributed amplifier
Stimulated Raman scattering effect
Distributed amplification, a communication fibre itself is a gain medium
Can add 40 km to increase a maximum transmitter-receiver distance
Upgrading of existing links to add more channels
A quite weak effect in silica fibre – very high powers have to be used
Safety problems (automatic laser shutdown - ALS)
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 50
Optical Networks
Raman Amplification
Counter-directionally pumping schemes
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 51
SDH(the world)/SONET(the U.S.) – ANSI, Telcordia, ITU Synchronous Digital Hierarchy/Synchronous Optical NETwork
Different terminology but the same in principle
Synchronous – TDM with input clocks synchronized to output clocks, byte-interleaved multiplexing
Distribution of accurate frequency only, not accurate time of the day!
For channelized voice traffic, circuit-switched technology (i.e. guaranteed bandwidth)
Excellent tools for trouble monitoring, detection, isolation
Next Gen: Generic Framing Procedure - ITU With two new protocols: VCAT Virtual Concatenation and LCAS Link Capacity
Adjustment Scheme
Efficient mapping of any client signals, dynamic bandwidth allocation, better granularity
Up to 40 Gb/s, 160 Gb/s will not be deployed, 100 G and beyond - OTN
Optical Networks
SDH/SONET
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 52
Optical Transport Networks - ITU
Similar to SDH/SONET concepts but not the same Layered structure, performance monitoring, protection etc.
New features added, like managing optical channels without need for OEO conversions (all optical approach)
FEC standard to enable longer optical spans
100 G interfaces defined (OTU 4) for 100 GE
„Transport for all digital payloads with superior performance and support for the next generation of dynamic services with operational efficiencies not expected from current optical wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) transport solutions.“
Architecture, Framing & Interfaces, Equipment Functions, Network Management and more… http://www.itu.int/itudoc/gs/promo/tsb/78799.pdf
Optical Networks
OTN
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 53
Common 50/100 GHz systems, C band, approx. 80/40 channels, C+L band approx. 160 channels
Commercially available 25 GHz systems and e.g. undersea 33 GHz systems
Why not ultra broadband? - Bandwidth demand satisfied by serial speed growth
10->40G transition
40G NRZ tolerance very weak CD 50ps/nm (equals to 3km of G.652 fibre), PMD 2,5 ps
ODB, DPSK proposed, but more strict design rules compared to 10G DQPSK NRZ ODB DPSK DQPSK
Optical Networks Present Transmission Systems
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L12 54
100G coherent DP-DQPSK (25GBaud) solves some issues
+ Works over 50 GHz grid
+ Design rules almost 10G; CD, PMD electronic compensation
- Sensitive to non-linearities, FWM->DCFs removal->coexistence with present 10G channels?
- Cost of complicated modulation format (TX+RX) + necessity of powerful DSPs and ADCs
Proposed alternative modulation formats: 16 QAM, OFDM, 3ASK-PSK,…
Optical Networks Present Transmission Systems
TE TM
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L12 55
Optical Networks Present Transmission Systems
TE TM
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 56
Profits from integration
Source: www.oiforum.com
Optical Networks Present Transmission Systems
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 57
„Digital“ DWDM system
Profits from photonic integration – photonic integrated circuits (PIC)
Do not use optical processing (DCM) but massive OEO regeneration in nodes
DWDM system on chip, source: Infinera
Optical Networks Present Transmission Systems
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 58
Working on 400 Gb/s and 1Tb/s per one serial lambda
DP-DQPSK
High channel bandwidth
ROADM + WSS have to support „flexi grid“
OFDM, 16 or 32 or 64-QAM with or without DP
High OSNR
Raman amplification
Decrease spacing of inline amplifier huts
Optical Networks Future Transmission
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L12 59
Optical Networks Future Transmission - Hero
Experiments
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L12 60
Optical Networks Future Transmission
New Fibers
[Jun Sakaguchi, Proc. OFCNFOEC2011, OWJ2]
Multicore fibers
Issues:
Amplification – experimental EDFA, Raman
Cross-talk - MIMO
Splices ?
Connectors ?
New fibers instalation
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L12 61
Optical Networks Future Transmission
New Fibers Few mode fibers - FMF
[OFCNFOEC2011,PDPB9]
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L1 2 62
Optical Networks
Conclusions
Till now, “long fat pipes”
High granularity (= lambda) routing exist today
ROADMs, WSS
Dynamics still limited
OTN functionality
Sub-lambda capacity switching (from SDH)
Done in electrical domain
Possibilities of electronic processing are limited
Optical Burst or Optical Packet Switching – still experiments only
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 63
[1] Agrawal G.P., „Fiber-Optic Comminications Systems“, 2002.
[2] Kartalopoulos S.V., „DWDM Networks, Devices and Technology“, 2003.
[3] Ramaswami R., Sivarijan K.N., „Optical Networks“, 2nd edition, 2002.
[4] Radil, J. - Karásek, M., „Experiments with 10 GE long-haul transmissions in academic and research networks.“, In: I2 member meeting, Arlington, VA, 2004.
[5] Vojtěch J., „CzechLight and CzechLight amplifiers“. In: 17th TF-NGN meeting, Zurych, Switzerland, April 2005.
[6] Vojtěch J., Karásek M., Radil J., „Extending the Reach of 10GE at 1310 nm “. In: ICTON 2005 meeting, Barcelona, Spain, 2005.
Optical Networks
References 1
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2011, L 12 64
[7] www.seefire.org, Deliverables
[8] czechligh.cesnet.cz, Publications
[9] ECOC 2004 , 2005 proceedings
[10] OFC 2004 , 2005 proceedings
[11]http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/mels/cm1500/dwdm/dwdm_ovr.htm
Optical Networks
References 2
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2010, Př. 3 65
Optical networks
Thank you for your attention!
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2010, Př. 3 66
Optical networks
Laboratory experiments
1GE NIL
300 km G.652 (EDFA only)
325 km G.652 (EDFA + Raman)
10GE NIL
2x10G+2x1G WDM 202km G.652 (EDFA + DCF)
2x10G WDM 250km G.652 (EDFA + Raman + DCF)
10G DWDM 302 km G.655+652 (EDFA + Raman)
8x10G DWDM 250km G.652 (EDFA + FBG)
10GE NIL bidirectional (single fibre) transmission
2x4x10G 210km G.652 (EDFA + FBGs)
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2010, Př. 3 67
Optical networks
Laboratory experiments
Tx1
MUX
Tx8
.
.
EDFA 1 EDFA 2
FBG
Rx1
Rx8
.
.
250 km G.652
DEMUX
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2010, Př. 3 68
Optical networks
Laboratory experiments
Bidirectional transmission over single fibre
Tx1
MUX 1
Tx4
EDFA 1 EDFA 2 Tx5
Tx8
210 km G.652
MUX 2
FBG 1 FBG 2
Rx1 Rx8 Rx5 Rx4
EDFA 3 EDFA 4
DEMUX 2 DEMUX 1
λ1+λ2+λ3+λ4
λ5+λ6+λ7+λ8
λ5+λ6+λ7+λ8
λ5+λ6+λ7+λ8
λ1+λ2+λ3+λ4
λ1+λ2+λ3+λ4
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2010, Př. 3 69
Optical networks
Real deployments
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2010, Př. 3 70
Optical networks
Real deployments
OSA (One Side Amplification) – all components are located at
one place, for star topologies
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2010, Př. 3 71
Optical networks
PDFAs/SOAs and Ramans for 1310 nm
Configuration Reach (km)
Guaranteed 10
In lab, no amps 30
Booster 85
Booster and preamp 120
Dual booster and Raman 135
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2010, Př. 3 72
Optical networks
PDFAs/SOAs 1310 nm
Eye diagram after preamp, l = 100 km
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2010, Př. 3 73
Optical networks PDFAs/SOAs for 1310 nm
Eye diagram after preamp, l = 120 km
Josef Vojtěch (FIT ČVUT) Optical Networks MI-MTI, 2010, Př. 3 74
Optical networks
PDFAs/SOAs for 1310 nm
Eye diagram after preamp and optical filter, l = 120 km