+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Santosky v Kramer 455 U.S. 745 Year 1982

Santosky v Kramer 455 U.S. 745 Year 1982

Date post: 06-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: thalia-sanders
View: 216 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend

of 33

Transcript
  • 8/3/2019 Santosky v Kramer 455 U.S. 745 Year 1982

    1/33

    Westlaw Delivery Summary Report for PATRON ACCESS,-

    Date/Time of Request: Monday, November 28, 2011 10:06 EasternClient Identifier: PATRON ACCESS

    Database: SCTFIND

    Citation Text: 102 S.Ct. 1388

    Lines: 1952

    Documents: 1

    Images: 0

    Santosky v. Kramer 455 u.s 745 (1982)

    The material accompanying this summary is subject to copyright. Usage is governed by contract with Thomson Reuters,

    West and their affiliates.

  • 8/3/2019 Santosky v Kramer 455 U.S. 745 Year 1982

    2/33

    Supreme Court of the United StatesJohn SANTOSKY II and Annie Santosky, Petition-

    ers

    v.

    Bernhardt S. KRAMER, Commissioner, Ulster

    County Department of Social Services, et al.

    No. 80-5889.

    Argued Nov. 10, 1981.

    Decided March 24, 1982.

    Parents appealed from judgment of the Family

    Court, Ulster County, Elwyn, J., which adjudgedtheir children to be permanently neglected. The

    New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, af-

    firmed, 75 A.D.2d 910, 427 N.Y.S.2d 319. The

    New York Court of Appeals dismissed the parents'

    appeal. Certiorari was granted. The Supreme Court,

    Justice Blackmun, held that before a state may

    sever completely and irrevocably the rights of par-

    ents in their natural child, due process requires that

    the state support its allegations by at least clear and

    convincing evidence, and, therefore, the fair pre-

    ponderance of the evidence standard prescribed by

    the New York Family Court Act for the termination

    of parental rights denied the parents due process.

    Judgment vacated and remanded.

    Justice Rehnquist, filed a dissenting opinion in

    which Chief Justice Burger, Justice White and

    Justice O'Connor, joined.

    West Headnotes

    [1] Child Custody 76D 42

    76D Child Custody

    76DII Grounds and Factors in General

    76DII(B) Factors Relating to Parties Seeking

    Custody

    76Dk42 k. Right of Biological Parent as

    to Third Persons in General. Most Cited Cases

    (Formerly 285k2(3.3))

    Child Custody 76D 68

    76D Child Custody

    76DII Grounds and Factors in General

    76DII(B) Factors Relating to Parties Seeking

    Custody

    76Dk68 k. Previous Abandonment or Re-

    linquishment by Custodian. Most Cited Cases

    (Formerly 285k2(3.7))

    Fundamental liberty interest of natural parents

    in care, custody and management of their child does

    not evaporate simply because they have not been

    model parents or have lost temporary custody of

    their child to State. U.S.C.A.Const.Amends. 5, 14.

    [2] Infants 211 191

    211 Infants

    211VIII Dependent, Neglected, and Delinquent

    Children

    211VIII(D) Proceedings

    211k191 k. In General. Most Cited Cases

    Even when blood relationships are strained,

    parents retain vital interest in preventing irretriev-

    able destruction of their family life; if anything,

    persons faced with forced dissolution of their par-

    ental rights have more critical need for procedural

    protections than do those resisting state intervention

    into ongoing family affairs.

    U.S.C.A.Const.Amends. 5, 14.

    [3] Infants 211 194.1

    211 Infants

    211VIII Dependent, Neglected, and Delinquent

    Children

    211VIII(D) Proceedings

    211k194 Nature, Form, and Purpose of

    Proceedings

    211k194.1 k. In General. Most Cited

    Cases

    (Formerly 211k194)

    When state moves to destroy weakened familial

    102 S.Ct. 1388 Page 1

    455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388, 71 L.Ed.2d 599

    (Cite as: 455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388)

    2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=602&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1980108192http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76Dhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76DIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76DII%28B%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76DII%28B%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76Dk42http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=76Dk42http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76Dhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76DIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76DII%28B%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76DII%28B%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76Dk68http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=76Dk68http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIII%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIII%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211k191http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=211k191http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIII%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIII%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211k194http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211k194.1http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=211k194.1http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=211k194.1http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=211k194.1http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=211k194.1http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211k194.1http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211k194http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIII%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=211k191http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211k191http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIII%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=76Dk68http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76Dk68http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76DII%28B%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76DIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76Dhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=76Dk42http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76Dk42http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76DII%28B%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76DIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=76Dhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=602&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1980108192
  • 8/3/2019 Santosky v Kramer 455 U.S. 745 Year 1982

    3/33

    bonds, it must provide parents with fundamentally

    fair procedures. U.S.C.A.Const.Amends. 5, 14.

    [4] Constitutional Law 92 4403.5

    92 Constitutional Law

    92XXVII Due Process

    92XXVII(G) Particular Issues and Applica-

    tions

    92XXVII(G)18 Families and Children

    92k4403.5 k. Removal or Termination

    of Parental Rights. Most Cited Cases

    (Formerly 92k4393, 92k274(5))

    Nature of process due in parental rights termin-

    ation proceedings turns on balancing of private in-

    terests affected by proceedings; risk of error created

    by state's chosen procedure; and countervailing

    governmental interest supporting use of challenged

    procedure. U.S.C.A.Const.Amends. 5, 14.

    [5] Constitutional Law 92 4006

    92 Constitutional Law

    92XXVII Due Process

    92XXVII(E) Civil Actions and Proceedings

    92k3999 Evidence and Witnesses

    92k4006 k. Degree or Standard of

    Proof. Most Cited Cases

    (Formerly 92k311)

    In any given proceeding, minimum standard of

    proof tolerated by due process requirement reflects

    not only weight of private and public interests af-

    fected, but also societal judgment about how risk of

    error should be distributed between litigants.

    U.S.C.A.Const.Amends. 5, 14.

    [6] Federal Courts 170B 416

    170B Federal Courts

    170BVI State Laws as Rules of Decision

    170BVI(C) Application to Particular Matters

    170Bk416 k. Evidence Law. Most Cited

    Cases

    Minimum standard of proof mandated by due

    process is question of federal law which Supreme

    Court may resolve. U.S.C.A.Const.Amends. 5, 14.

    [7] Constitutional Law 92 3888

    92 Constitutional Law

    92XXVII Due Process

    92XXVII(B) Protections Provided and

    Deprivations Prohibited in General

    92k3878 Notice and Hearing

    92k3888 k. Review. Most Cited Cases

    (Formerly 92k251.5)

    Retrospective case-by-case review cannot pre-

    serve fundamental fairness when class of proceed-

    ings is governed by constitutionally defective evid-

    entiary standard. U.S.C.A.Const.Amends. 5, 14.

    [8] Constitutional Law 92 3875

    92 Constitutional Law

    92XXVII Due Process

    92XXVII(B) Protections Provided and

    Deprivations Prohibited in General

    92k3875 k. Factors Considered; Flexibil-

    ity and Balancing. Most Cited Cases

    (Formerly 92k251.5)

    Constitutional Law 92 3912

    92 Constitutional Law

    92XXVII Due Process

    92XXVII(B) Protections Provided andDeprivations Prohibited in General

    92k3912 k. Duration and Timing of

    Deprivation; Pre- or Post-Deprivation Remedies.

    Most Cited Cases

    (Formerly 92k251.5)

    Whether loss threatened by particular type of

    proceeding is sufficiently grave to warrant more

    than average certainty on part of fact finder turns

    on both nature of private interest threatened and

    permanency of threatened loss.

    U.S.C.A.Const.Amends. 5, 14.

    [9] Infants 211 179

    211 Infants

    211VIII Dependent, Neglected, and Delinquent

    Children

    211VIII(C) Evidence

    102 S.Ct. 1388 Page 2

    455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388, 71 L.Ed.2d 599

    (Cite as: 455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388)

    2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%2918http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28E%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28E%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k3999http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k4006http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k4006http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVI%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVI%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bk416http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=170Bk416http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=170Bk416http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28B%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28B%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k3878http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k3888http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k3888http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28B%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28B%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k3875http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k3875http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28B%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28B%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k3912http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k3912http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIII%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIII%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIII%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k3912http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k3912http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28B%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k3875http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k3875http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28B%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k3888http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k3888http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k3878http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28B%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=170Bk416http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=170Bk416http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bk416http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVI%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k4006http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k4006http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k3999http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28E%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%2918http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=L
  • 8/3/2019 Santosky v Kramer 455 U.S. 745 Year 1982

    4/33

    211k175 Weight and Sufficiency

    211k179 k. Deprivation, Neglect, or

    Abuse. Most Cited Cases

    In parental rights termination proceeding,

    private interest affected weighs heavily against use

    of preponderance of the evidence standard at state-

    initiated permanent neglect proceeding.

    U.S.C.A.Const.Amends. 5, 14.

    [10] Constitutional Law 92 4403.5

    92 Constitutional Law

    92XXVII Due Process

    92XXVII(G) Particular Issues and Applica-

    tions

    92XXVII(G)18 Families and Children

    92k4403.5 k. Removal or Termination

    of Parental Rights. Most Cited Cases

    (Formerly 92k4402, 92k274(5))

    Until state proves parental unfitness under New

    York law, child and his parents share vital interest

    in preventing erroneous termination of the natural

    relationship, and, therefore, preponderance of the

    evidence standard provided under New York law

    does not satisfy due process clause.

    N.Y.McKinney's Social Service Law 384-b,

    subds. 4(d), 7(a); N.Y.McKinney's Family Court

    Act 622; U.S.C.A.Const.Amends. 5, 14.

    [11] Constitutional Law 92 4403.5

    92 Constitutional Law

    92XXVII Due Process

    92XXVII(G) Particular Issues and Applica-

    tions

    92XXVII(G)18 Families and Children

    92k4403.5 k. Removal or Termination

    of Parental Rights. Most Cited Cases

    (Formerly 92k4402, 92k274(5))

    Preponderance of the evidence standardprovided for in New York statutes governing ter-

    mination of parental rights upon finding that child

    is permanently neglected does not properly alloc-

    ate risk of error between parent and child, since, for

    child, likely consequence of erroneous failure to

    terminate is preservation of uneasy status quo, but

    for natural parents, consequence of erroneous ter-

    mination is unnecessary destruction of natural fam-

    ily, and, therefore, due process mandates standard

    of proof greater than fair preponderance of the

    evidence. N.Y.McKinney's Social Service Law

    384-b, subds. 4(d), 7(a); N.Y.McKinney's Family

    Court Act 622; U.S.C.A.Const.Amends. 5, 14.

    [12] Infants 211 178

    211 Infants

    211VIII Dependent, Neglected, and Delinquent

    Children

    211VIII(C) Evidence

    211k175 Weight and Sufficiency

    211k178 k. Termination of Parental

    Rights. Most Cited Cases

    Standard of proof more strict than fair prepon-

    derance of the evidence is consistent with two state

    interests at stake in parental rights termination pro-

    ceedings, parens patriae interest in preserving and

    promoting child's welfare and fiscal and adminis-

    trative interest in reducing costs and burden of such

    proceedings. N.Y.McKinney's Social Service Law

    384-b, subds. 1(a)(i, ii, iv), 3(g), 4(e);

    N.Y.McKinney's Family Court Act 622;

    U.S.C.A.Const.Amends. 5, 14.

    [13] Constitutional Law 92 4403.5

    92 Constitutional Law

    92XXVII Due Process

    92XXVII(G) Particular Issues and Applica-

    tions

    92XXVII(G)18 Families and Children

    92k4403.5 k. Removal or Termination

    of Parental Rights. Most Cited Cases

    (Formerly 92k4393, 92k274(5))

    Before state may sever completely and irrevoc-

    ably rights of parents in their natural child, due pro-cess requires that state support its allegations by at

    least clear and convincing evidence.

    N.Y.McKinney's Social Service Law 384-b,

    subds. 4(d), 7(a); N.Y.McKinney's Family Court

    Act 622; U.S.C.A.Const.Amends. 5, 14.

    102 S.Ct. 1388 Page 3

    455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388, 71 L.Ed.2d 599

    (Cite as: 455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388)

    2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211k175http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211k179http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=211k179http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%2918http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%2918http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIII%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIII%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211k175http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211k178http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=211k178http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%2918http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%2918http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=211k178http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211k178http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211k175http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIII%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211VIIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%2918http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%2918http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=211k179http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211k179http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=211k175
  • 8/3/2019 Santosky v Kramer 455 U.S. 745 Year 1982

    5/33

    [14] Constitutional Law 92 4403.5

    92 Constitutional Law

    92XXVII Due Process

    92XXVII(G) Particular Issues and Applica-

    tions

    92XXVII(G)18 Families and Children

    92k4403.5 k. Removal or Termination

    of Parental Rights. Most Cited Cases

    (Formerly 92k4393, 92k274(5))

    Clear and convincing evidence standard ad-

    equately conveys to fact finder level of subjective

    certainty about his factual conclusions necessary to

    satisfy due process in proceedings in which state

    seeks to completely and irrevocably sever rights of

    parents in their natural child. N.Y.McKinney's So-cial Service Law 384-b, subds. 4(d), 7(a);

    N.Y.McKinney's Family Court Act 622;

    U.S.C.A.Const.Amends. 5, 14.

    [15] Federal Courts 170B 416

    170B Federal Courts

    170BVI State Laws as Rules of Decision

    170BVI(C) Application to Particular Matters

    170Bk416 k. Evidence Law. Most Cited

    Cases

    Determination of precise burden of proof equalto or greater than clear and convincing evidence

    standard, for purpose of proceedings in which par-

    ental rights are terminated, is matter of state law

    properly left to the state legislatures and state

    courts. N.Y.McKinney's Social Service Law

    384-b, subds. 4(d), 7(a); N.Y.McKinney's Family

    Court Act 622; U.S.C.A.Const.Amends. 5, 14.

    **1390 SyllabusFN*

    FN* The syllabus constitutes no part of the

    opinion of the Court but has been prepared

    by the Reporter of Decisions for the con-

    venience of the reader. See United States v.

    Detroit Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26

    S.Ct. 282, 287, 50 L.Ed. 499.

    *745 Under New York law, the State may ter-

    minate, over parental objection, the rights of par-

    ents in their natural child upon a finding that the

    child is permanently neglected. The New York

    Family Court Act ( 622) requires that only a fair

    preponderance of the evidence support that find-

    ing. Neglect proceedings were brought in Family

    Court to terminate petitioners' rights as natural par-

    ents in their three children. Rejecting petitioners'

    challenge to the constitutionality of 622's fair

    preponderance of the evidence standard, the Fam-

    ily Court weighed the evidence under that standard

    and found permanent neglect. After a subsequent

    dispositional hearing, the Family Court ruled that

    the best interests of the children required permanent

    termination of petitioners' custody. The Appellate

    Division of the New York Supreme Court affirmed,and the New York Court of Appeals dismissed peti-

    tioners' appeal to that court.

    Held:

    1. Process is constitutionally due a natural par-

    ent at a state-initiated parental rights termination

    proceeding. Pp. 1393-1396.

    (a) The fundamental liberty interest of natural

    parents in the care, custody, and management of

    their child is protected by the Fourteenth Amend-ment, and does not evaporate simply because they

    have not been model parents or have lost temporary

    custody of their child to the State. A parental rights

    termination proceeding interferes with that funda-

    mental liberty interest. When the State moves to

    destroy weakened familial bonds, it must provide

    the parents with fundamentally fair procedures. Pp.

    1393-1394.

    (b) The nature of the process due in parental

    rights termination proceedings turns on a balancing

    of three factors: the private interests affected by theproceedings; the risk of error created by the State's

    chosen procedure; and the countervailing govern-

    mental interest supporting use of the challenged

    procedure. Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335,

    96 S.Ct. 893, 903, 47 L.Ed.2d 18. In any given pro-

    ceeding, the minimum standard of proof tolerated

    102 S.Ct. 1388 Page 4

    455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388, 71 L.Ed.2d 599

    (Cite as: 455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388)

    2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%2918http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVI%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVI%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bk416http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=170Bk416http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=170Bk416http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1976142314&ReferencePosition=903http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1976142314&ReferencePosition=903http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1976142314&ReferencePosition=903http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1976142314&ReferencePosition=903http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1976142314&ReferencePosition=903http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1976142314&ReferencePosition=903http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=170Bk416http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=170Bk416http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bk416http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVI%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384-B&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92k4403.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%2918http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVII%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92XXVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=92
  • 8/3/2019 Santosky v Kramer 455 U.S. 745 Year 1982

    6/33

    by the due process requirement reflects not only the

    weight of the public and *746 private**1391 in-

    terests affected, but also a societal judgment about

    how the risk of error should be distributed between

    the litigants. The minimum standard is a question of

    federal law which this Court may resolve. Retro-

    spective case-by-case review cannot preserve fun-

    damental fairness when a class of proceedings is

    governed by a constitutionally defective evidentiary

    standard. Pp. 1394-1396.

    2. The fair preponderance of the evidence

    standard prescribed by 622 violates the Due Pro-

    cess Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Pp.

    1396-1402.

    (a) The balance of private interests affected

    weighs heavily against use of such a standard in

    parental rights termination proceedings, since the

    private interest affected is commanding and the

    threatened loss is permanent. Once affirmed on ap-

    peal, a New York decision terminating parental

    rights is final and irrevocable. Pp. 1397-1398.

    (b) A preponderance standard does not fairly

    allocate the risk of an erroneous factfinding

    between the State and the natural parents. In parent-

    al rights termination proceedings, which bear manyof the indicia of a criminal trial, numerous factors

    combine to magnify the risk of erroneous factfind-

    ing. Coupled with the preponderance standard,

    these factors create a significant prospect of erro-

    neous termination of parental rights. A standard of

    proof that allocates the risk of error nearly equally

    between an erroneous failure to terminate, which

    leaves the child in an uneasy status quo, and an er-

    roneous termination, which unnecessarily destroys

    the natural family, does not reflect properly the rel-

    ative severity of these two outcomes. Pp.

    1398-1401.

    (c) A standard of proof more strict than prepon-

    derance of the evidence is consistent with the two

    state interests at stake in parental rights termination

    proceedings-a parens patriae interest in preserving

    and promoting the child's welfare and a fiscal and

    administrative interest in reducing the cost and bur-

    den of such proceedings. Pp. 1401-1402.

    3. Before a State may sever completely and ir-

    revocably the rights of parents in their natural child,

    due process requires that the State support its alleg-

    ations by at least clear and convincing evidence. A

    clear and convincing evidence standard ad-

    equately conveys to the factfinder the level of sub-

    jective certainty about his factual conclusions ne-

    cessary to satisfy due process. Determination of the

    precise burden equal to or greater than that standard

    is a matter of state law properly left to state legis-

    latures and state courts. Pp. 1402-1403.

    75 App.Div.2d 910, 427 N.Y.S.2d 319, vacated

    and remanded.

    *747 Martin Guggenheim, New York City, for peti-

    tioners.

    Stephen Scavuzzo, Washington, D. C., for respond-

    ents, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court.

    Justice BLACKMUN delivered the opinion of the

    Court.

    Under New York law, the State may terminate,

    over parental objection, the rights of parents in their

    natural child upon a finding that the child ispermanently neglected. N.Y.Soc.Serv.Law

    384-b.4.(d), 384-b.7. (a) (McKinney

    Supp.1981-1982) (Soc.Serv.Law). The New York

    Family Court Act 622 (McKinney 1975 and

    Supp.1981-1982) (Fam.Ct.Act) requires that only a

    fair preponderance of the evidence support that

    finding. Thus, in New York, the factual certainty

    required to extinguish the parent-child relationship

    is no greater than that necessary to award money

    damages in an ordinary civil action.

    Today we hold that the Due Process Clause of

    the Fourteenth Amendment demands more than

    this. Before a State may sever completely and irre-

    vocably the rights of parents in *748 their natural

    child, due process requires that the State support its

    **1392 allegations by at least clear and convincing

    102 S.Ct. 1388 Page 5

    455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388, 71 L.Ed.2d 599

    (Cite as: 455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388)

    2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=602&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1980108192http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000300&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000300&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=602&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1980108192http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=L
  • 8/3/2019 Santosky v Kramer 455 U.S. 745 Year 1982

    7/33

    evidence.

    I

    A

    New York authorizes its officials to remove a

    child temporarily from his or her home if the child

    appears neglected, within the meaning of Art. 10

    of the Family Court Act. See 1012(f),

    1021-1029. Once removed, a child under the age of

    18 customarily is placed in the care of an author-

    ized agency, Soc.Serv.Law 384-b.7.(a), usually a

    state institution or a foster home. At that point, the

    state's first obligation is to help the family with ser-

    vices to ... reunite it.... 384-b.1.(a)(iii). But if

    convinced that positive, nurturing parent-child re-

    lationships no longer exist, 384-b.1.(b), the Statemay initiate permanent neglect proceedings to

    free the child for adoption.

    The State bifurcates its permanent neglect pro-

    ceeding into fact-finding and dispositional

    hearings. Fam.Ct.Act 622, 623. At the factfind-

    ing stage, the State must prove that the child has

    been permanently neglected, as defined by

    Fam.Ct.Act 614.1.(a)-(d) and Soc.Serv.Law

    384-b.7. (a). See Fam.Ct.Act 622. The Family

    Court judge then determines at a subsequent dispos-

    itional hearing what placement would serve thechild's best interests. 623, 631.

    At the factfinding hearing, the State must es-

    tablish, among other things, that for more than a

    year after the child entered state custody, the

    agency made diligent efforts to encourage and

    strengthen the parental relationship. Fam.Ct.Act

    614.1.(c), 611. The State must further prove that

    during that same period, the child's natural parents

    failed substantially and continuously or repeatedly

    to maintain contact with or plan for the future of the

    child although physically and financially able to doso. 614.1(d). Should the State support its allega-

    tions by a fair preponderance of the evidence,

    622, the child may be declared permanently neg-

    lected.*749 611. That declaration empowers the

    Family Court judge to terminate permanently the

    natural parents' rights in the child. 631(c), 634.

    Termination denies the natural parents physical

    custody, as well as the rights ever to visit, commu-

    nicate with, or regain custody of the child.FN1

    FN1. At oral argument, counsel for peti-

    tioners asserted that, in New York, natural

    parents have no means of restoring termin-

    ated parental rights. Tr. of Oral Arg. 9.

    Counsel for respondents, citing

    Fam.Ct.Act 1061, answered that parents

    may petition the Family Court to vacate or

    set aside an earlier order on narrow

    grounds, such as newly discovered evid-

    ence or fraud. Tr. of Oral Arg. 26. Counsel

    for respondents conceded, however, that

    this statutory provision has never been in-voked to set aside a permanent neglect

    finding. Id., at 27.

    New York's permanent neglect statute provides

    natural parents with certain procedural protections.FN2

    But New York permits its officials to establish

    permanent neglect with less proof than most

    States require. Thirty-five States, the District of

    Columbia, and the Virgin Islands currently specify

    a higher standard of proof, in parental rights ter-

    mination proceedings, than a fair preponderance of

    the evidence.FN3

    **1393 The only analogousfederal statute of which we are aware *750 permits

    termination of parental rights solely upon evidence

    beyond a reasonable doubt. Indian Child Welfare

    Act of 1978, Pub.L. 95-608, 102(f), 92 Stat. 3072,

    25 U.S.C. 1912(f) (1976 ed., Supp.IV). The ques-

    tion here is whether *751 New York's fair prepon-

    derance of the evidence standard is constitution-

    ally sufficient.

    FN2. Most notably, natural parents have a

    statutory right to the assistance of counsel

    and of court-appointed counsel if they areindigent. Fam.Ct.Act 262(a)(iii).

    FN3. Fifteen States, by statute, have re-

    quired clear and convincing evidence or

    its equivalent. See Alaska Stat.Ann.

    47.10.080(c)(3) (1980); Cal.Civ.Code Ann.

    102 S.Ct. 1388 Page 6

    455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388, 71 L.Ed.2d 599

    (Cite as: 455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388)

    2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS623&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS623&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS631&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000300&DocName=NYFCS611&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000300&DocName=NYFCS611&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS631&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS634&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS1061&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1077005&DocName=UU%28I9819B45CC5-864920B0079-24EB3F5CDE9%29&FindType=lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=25USCAS1912&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_ae0d0000c5150http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS262&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000003&DocName=AKSTS47.10.080&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000003&DocName=AKSTS47.10.080&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000003&DocName=AKSTS47.10.080&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000003&DocName=AKSTS47.10.080&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS262&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=25USCAS1912&FindType=L&ReferencePositionType=T&ReferencePosition=SP_ae0d0000c5150http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1077005&DocName=UU%28I9819B45CC5-864920B0079-24EB3F5CDE9%29&FindType=lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS1061&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS634&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS631&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000300&DocName=NYFCS611&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000300&DocName=NYFCS611&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS631&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS623&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS623&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000093&DocName=NYFCS622&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=L
  • 8/3/2019 Santosky v Kramer 455 U.S. 745 Year 1982

    8/33

    232(a)(7) (West Supp.1982); Ga.Code

    24A-2201(c), 24A-3201 (1979); Iowa

    Code 600A.8 (1981) (clear and convin-

    cing proof); Me.Rev.Stat.Ann., Tit. 22,

    4055.1.B.(2) (Supp.1981-1982);

    Mich.Comp.Laws 722.25

    (Supp.1981-1982); Mo.Rev.Stat.

    211.447.2(2) (Supp.1981) (clear, cogent

    and convincing evidence), N.M.Stat.Ann.

    40-7-4.J. (Supp.1981); N.C.Gen.Stat.

    7A-289.30(e) (1981) (clear, cogent, and

    convincing evidence); Ohio Rev.Code

    Ann. 2151.35, 2151.414(B) (Page

    Supp.1982); R.I.Gen.Laws 15-7-7(d)

    (Supp.1980); Tenn.Code Ann. 37-246(d)

    (Supp.1981); Va.Code 16.1-283.B(Supp.1981); W.Va.Code 49-6-2(c)

    (1980) (clear and convincing proof);

    Wis.Stat. 48.31(1) (Supp.1981-1982).

    Fifteen States, the District of Columbia,

    and the Virgin Islands, by court decision,

    have required clear and convincing

    evidence or its equivalent. See Dale

    County Dept. of Pensions & Security v.

    Robles, 368 So.2d 39, 42

    (Ala.Civ.App.1979); Harper v. Caskin,

    265 Ark. 558, 560-561, 580 S.W.2d 176,178 (1979); In re J. S. R., 374 A.2d 860,

    864 (D.C.1977); Torres v. Van Eepoel,

    98 So.2d 735, 737 (Fla.1957); In re

    Kerns, 225 Kan. 746, 753, 594 P.2d 187,

    193 (1979); In re Rosenbloom, 266

    N.W.2d 888, 889 (Minn.1978) (clear

    and convincing proof); In re J. L. B.,

    182 Mont. 100, 116-117, 594 P.2d 1127,

    1136 (1979); In re Souza, 204 Neb. 503,

    510, 283 N.W.2d 48, 52 (1979); J. v. M.,

    157 N.J.Super. 478, 489, 385 A.2d 240,

    246 (App.Div.1978); In re J.A., 283

    N.W.2d 83, 92 (N.D.1979); In re Darren

    Todd H., 615 P.2d 287, 289 (Okl.1980);

    In re William L., 477 Pa. 322, 332, 383

    A.2d 1228, 1233, cert. denied sub nom.

    Lehman v. Lycoming County Children's

    Services, 439 U.S. 880, 99 S.Ct. 216, 5 8

    L.Ed.2d 192 (1978); In re G. M., 596

    S.W.2d 846, 847 (Tex.1980); In re Pitts,

    535 P.2d 1244, 1248 (Utah 1975); In re

    Maria, 15 V.I. 368, 384 (1978); In re

    Sego, 82 Wash.2d 736, 739, 513 P.2d

    831, 833 (1973) (clear, cogent, and

    convincing evidence); In re X., 607

    P.2d 911, 919 (Wyo.1980) (clear and

    unequivocal).

    South Dakota's Supreme Court has re-

    quired a clear preponderance of the

    evidence in a dependency proceeding.

    See In re B.E., 287 N.W.2d 91, 96

    (1979). Two States, New Hampshire andLouisiana, have barred parental rights

    terminations unless the key allegations

    have been proved beyond a reasonable

    doubt. See State v. Robert H., 118 N.H.

    713, 716, 393 A.2d 1387, 1389 (1978);

    La.Rev.Stat.Ann. 13:1603.A (West

    Supp.1982). Two States, Illinois and

    New York, have required clear and con-

    vincing evidence, but only in certain

    types of parental rights termination pro-

    ceedings. See Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 37,

    705-9(2), (3) (1979), amended by Act ofSept. 11, 1981, 1982 Ill.Laws, P.A.

    82-437 (generally requiring a preponder-

    ance of the evidence, but requiring clear

    and convincing evidence to terminate the

    rights of minor parents and mentally ill

    or mentally deficient parents);

    N.Y.Soc.Serv.Law 384-b.3(g), 384-

    b.4(c), and 384-b.4(e) (requiring clear

    and convincing proof before parental

    rights may be terminated for reasons of

    mental illness and mental retardation or

    severe and repeated child abuse).

    So far as we are aware, only two federal

    courts have addressed the issue. Each

    has held that allegations supporting par-

    ental rights termination must be proved

    102 S.Ct. 1388 Page 7

    455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388, 71 L.Ed.2d 599

    (Cite as: 455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388)

    2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000200&DocName=CACIS232&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000256&DocName=IASTS600A.8&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000256&DocName=IASTS600A.8&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000043&DocName=MIST722.25&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000043&DocName=MIST722.25&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000037&DocName=NCSTS7A-289.30&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000037&DocName=NCSTS7A-289.30&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000279&DocName=OHSTS2151.35&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000279&DocName=OHSTS2151.35&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000279&DocName=OHSTS2151.414&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000038&DocName=RISTS15-7-7&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000038&DocName=RISTS15-7-7&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000041&DocName=WVSTS49-6-2&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000041&DocName=WVSTS49-6-2&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000260&DocName=WIST48.31&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=735&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979107557&ReferencePosition=42http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=735&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979107557&ReferencePosition=42http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=735&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979107557&ReferencePosition=42http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=735&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979107557&ReferencePosition=42http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=735&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979107557&ReferencePosition=42http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=713&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979129417&ReferencePosition=178http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=713&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979129417&ReferencePosition=178http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=713&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979129417&ReferencePosition=178http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=713&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979129417&ReferencePosition=178http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1977102751&ReferencePosition=864http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1977102751&ReferencePosition=864http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1977102751&ReferencePosition=864http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=735&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1958125514&ReferencePosition=737http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=735&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1958125514&ReferencePosition=737http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=735&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1958125514&ReferencePosition=737http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979123826&ReferencePosition=193http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979123826&ReferencePosition=193http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979123826&ReferencePosition=193http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979123826&ReferencePosition=193http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978127878&ReferencePosition=889http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978127878&ReferencePosition=889http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978127878&ReferencePosition=889http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979124028&ReferencePosition=1136http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979124028&ReferencePosition=1136http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979124028&ReferencePosition=1136http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979124028&ReferencePosition=1136http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979122893&ReferencePosition=52http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979122893&ReferencePosition=52http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979122893&ReferencePosition=52http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978142426&ReferencePosition=246http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978142426&ReferencePosition=246http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978142426&ReferencePosition=246http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978142426&ReferencePosition=246http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979122900&ReferencePosition=92http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979122900&ReferencePosition=92http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979122900&ReferencePosition=92http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980124629&ReferencePosition=289http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980124629&ReferencePosition=289http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980124629&ReferencePosition=289http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978100656&ReferencePosition=1233http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978100656&ReferencePosition=1233http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978100656&ReferencePosition=1233http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1978227570http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1978227570http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1978227570http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=713&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980110411&ReferencePosition=847http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=713&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980110411&ReferencePosition=847http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=713&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980110411&ReferencePosition=847http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1975126700&ReferencePosition=1248http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1975126700&ReferencePosition=1248http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1975126700&ReferencePosition=1248http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1973124763&ReferencePosition=833http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1973124763&ReferencePosition=833http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1973124763&ReferencePosition=833http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1973124763&ReferencePosition=833http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980304465&ReferencePosition=919http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980304465&ReferencePosition=919http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980304465&ReferencePosition=919http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980199992&ReferencePosition=96http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980199992&ReferencePosition=96http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980199992&ReferencePosition=96http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978117222&ReferencePosition=1389http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978117222&ReferencePosition=1389http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978117222&ReferencePosition=1389http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000300&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000300&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000300&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000300&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000136&DocName=NYSVS384&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978117222&ReferencePosition=1389http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978117222&ReferencePosition=1389http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978117222&ReferencePosition=1389http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980199992&ReferencePosition=96http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980199992&ReferencePosition=96http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980199992&ReferencePosition=96http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980304465&ReferencePosition=919http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980304465&ReferencePosition=919http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980304465&ReferencePosition=919http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1973124763&ReferencePosition=833http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1973124763&ReferencePosition=833http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1973124763&ReferencePosition=833http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1973124763&ReferencePosition=833http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1975126700&ReferencePosition=1248http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1975126700&ReferencePosition=1248http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1975126700&ReferencePosition=1248http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=713&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980110411&ReferencePosition=847http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=713&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980110411&ReferencePosition=847http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=713&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980110411&ReferencePosition=847http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1978227570http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1978227570http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1978227570http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978100656&ReferencePosition=1233http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978100656&ReferencePosition=1233http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978100656&ReferencePosition=1233http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980124629&ReferencePosition=289http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980124629&ReferencePosition=289http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1980124629&ReferencePosition=289http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979122900&ReferencePosition=92http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979122900&ReferencePosition=92http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979122900&ReferencePosition=92http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978142426&ReferencePosition=246http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978142426&ReferencePosition=246http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978142426&ReferencePosition=246http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978142426&ReferencePosition=246http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979122893&ReferencePosition=52http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979122893&ReferencePosition=52http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979122893&ReferencePosition=52http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979124028&ReferencePosition=1136http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979124028&ReferencePosition=1136http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979124028&ReferencePosition=1136http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=661&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1979124028&ReferencePosition=1136http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978127878&ReferencePosition=889http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978127878&ReferencePosition=889http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=595&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1978127878&ReferencePosition=889http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&D

Recommended