Defence of DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONOstrava, December 12, 2007
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Ing. Petr Konečný
TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
POSUZOVÁNÍ SPOLEHLIVOSTI ŽELEZOBETONOVÉ MOSTOVKYS OHLEDEM K PŮSOBENÍ CHLORIDŮ
Supervisor: Prof. Ing. Pavel MAREK, DrSc.
Faculty of Civil Engineering
VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava
Czech Republic.
Outline� Introduction� Objectives of the thesis
� Chloride diffusion - 2D FEM model
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ
� SBRA in ANSYS FEM system
� Example
� Results of parametric study
� Brief summary and conclusions
Introduction� A lot of bridges from reinforced concrete needs early
reconstructions due to early degradation.
� Durability of RC bridge decks are reduced especially
due to corrosion of reinforcement followed by cover
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ
due to corrosion of reinforcement followed by cover
degradation and loss of carrying capacity.
� Deterioration models can help in the identification of
significant parameters in order to build more durable
structures.
� Nature of deterioration problems involves stochastic � Nature of deterioration problems involves stochastic
parameters. It is a field for application of probabilistic
method such as Simulated-Based Reliability
Assessment (SBRA)
Introduction – Protection against Deicers
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ
� Selected bridge deck has reinforcement
protected by cover and epoxy-coating
� Typical protection in Northeastern USA
RC Slab Epoxy-coated Rebars
Asphalt OverlayWaterproof MembraneRC Slab Non-protected Rebars
� Typical protection in Northeastern USA
Epoxy-coated Rebars
e.g. Northeastern USA Europe
Introduction – Crack vs. Holidays
� Reinforcing steel corrosion initiationis accelerated by interaction of:� Cracks in RC bridge deck
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ
� Flaws in epoxi-coating of reinforcing steel (mashed and bare areas, holidays)
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝObjectives of the thesis
� Probabilistic durability assessment of concrete bridges� Probabilistic durability assessment of concrete bridgesaffected by deicing agents applied to melt snow.
� Study of the potential of SBRA method with respect to chloride ingress induced corrosion of bridge decksthat have steel reinforcement protected with epoxy-coating.
� Development of the:
Page 6
� Development of the:� 2-D FEM diffusion model that can address
the crack effect.
� Software tool for integration of the SBRA method and commercial FEM package.
Diffusion Coefficient
0 25*10-12 m2/s
Diffusion Coefficient
0 25*10-12 m2/s
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝEstimation of Corrosion Initiation Likelihood
• 2D – FEM chloride
ingress model
2D – FEM chloride
ingress model
• SBRA module for
ANSYS PDS
environment
Diffusion Coefficient
0 25*10-12 m2/s
Diffusion Coefficient
0 25*10-12 m2/s
Page 7
environment
• Example
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝIntroduction – Bridge Deck
Bridge Structure
Page 8
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝIntroduction – Bridge Deck
Transverse cross-section
Page 9
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝIntroduction – Bridge Deck
Analyzed element
Page 10
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝIntroduction – Bridge Deck
Analyzed element
Page 11
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝIntroduction – Bridge Deck
Crack
Page 12
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝIntroduction – Bridge Deck
Element cross-section
Page 13
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝIntroduction – Bridge Deck
Efect of transverse crack on chloride ion ingresson chloride ion ingress
Page 14
Longitudinal rebar
Holidays on rebarepoxy-coating
2D – FEM chloride ingress model
� Chloride ingress is modelled by diffusion using 2.ND Ficks law
� 2D – Numerical solution with FEM utilization� Acceptable for chloride ingress modelling with regards to
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ
� Acceptable for chloride ingress modelling with regards to bridge deck crack vs. damaged epoxy-coated rebar system interaction.
� ANSYS Program system
• Heat transfer / diffusion process analogy
• Transient analysis
� Stochastic parameters
� Apparent diffusion coefficient,
� Rebar depth,
� Crack depth,
� Epoxy-coated rebar damage, etc.
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ2D – FEM chloride ingress model
Mesh and boundary conditions
Chlorides “loading” 0.6%
0.25
m
Chloride concentration after 10 years
Chlorides “loading” 0.6%
≈3500 Elements (Plane55)
Page 16
Model of bridge deck in ANSYS
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ2D – FEM chloride ingress model
Mesh and boundary conditions
Chlorides “loading” 0.6%
0.25
m
Concentration of soluble chlorides – 10 years
Chlorides “loading” 0.6%
≈3500 Elements (Plane55)
Page 17
Model of bridge deck in ANSYS
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ2D – FEM chloride ingress model
Mesh and boundary conditions
Chlorides “loading” 0.6%
0.25
m
Rebar
Concentration of soluble chlorides – 10 years
Chlorides “loading” 0.6%
≈3500 Elements (Plane55)
Page 18
Model of bridge deck in ANSYS
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ2D – FEM chloride ingress model
Mesh and boundary conditions
Chlorides “loading” 0.6%
Holiday
0.25
m
Rebar
Concentration of soluble chlorides – 10 years
Chlorides “loading” 0.6%
≈3500 Elements
Page 19
Model of bridge deck in ANSYS
2D – FEM chloride ingress model
FEM macro scheme
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ
2-D FEM model (time-dependant chloride ion concentration computation)
Input
Reliability Analysis(corrosion initialisation)
ANSYS APDL macro language.
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝEstimation of Corrosion Initiation Likelihood
• 2D – FEM chloride
ingress model
2D – FEM chloride
ingress model
• SBRA module for
ANSYS PDS
environment
Diffusion Coefficient
0 25*10-12 m2/s
Diffusion Coefficient
0 25*10-12 m2/s
Page 21
environment
• Example
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝIntroduction – Reliability Assessment
� Simulation-Based Reliability Assessment SBRA
� Safety, Serviceability� Safety, Serviceability
� Performance-Based Design� Durability, Corrosion, Fatigue, Degradation of Materials
� Reliability is expressed by probability of corrosion initiation Pf
( ) ( )00 <RFP=<SRP=Pf −
Page 22
( ) ( )00 <RFP=<SRP=Pf −
Stochastic Idea of Deterioration Problem
Chl
orid
e C
once
ntra
tion
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ
Durability with Regards to Chloride Ion Ingress
Threshold for Corrosion Initiation: Cth
C
Chl
orid
e C
once
ntra
tion
Cth
RF(t)=Cth-Cx,t
Corrosion Propagation
Chl
orid
e C
once
ntra
tion
Life SpanCorrosion Initiation Period
Cx,t
( ) ( )00,, <RFP=<CCP=P ttxthtf −
SBRA in ANSYS FEM system
� Probabilistic reliability analysis usingSBRA module for ANSYS:
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ
� Probabilistic analysis of systems using universal FEM software.
� Variables described by both nonparametric distributions (histograms) and parametric.
� Direct Monte Carlo simulation.
SBRA module for ANSYS
Random variable-----------SBRA Module
ANSYS
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ
eg. 10k cycles
Random variable-----------(RV) description---------
SBRA Module
Monte Carlo Simulation
•RV generation
•FEM macro – diffusion model
•Input & Output log
Macro language APDLCrack Depth
0
Interactive evaluation-----------------of results
ANSYSPDS
•Input & Output log
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝEstimation of Corrosion Initiation Likelihood
• 2D – FEM chloride
ingress model
2D – FEM chloride
ingress model
• SBRA module for
ANSYS PDS
environment
Diffusion Coefficient
0 25*10-12 m2/s
Diffusion Coefficient
0 25*10-12 m2/s
Page 26
environment
• Example
Example
� Response to the considered “loading” by chlorides is computed using Fick’s second Law of diffusion.
Reliability is expressed using probability of
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ
� Reliability is expressed using probability of
corosion initiation that is time-dependent.
� Pf,t =P ( RFt ≤ 0 ) [m-2]
� Reliability function: RF = Cth - Cx,y,t
� C - chloride ion concentration in the � Cx,y,t- chloride ion concentration in the most exposed loaction of the reinforcement
� Cth – chloride threshold[% by mass of total cementitious materials]
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝExample – Input Parameters
� Random variables are described based on field � Random variables are described based on field
date and engineering judgement using histograms
and parametric distributions.
Diffusion CoefficientDiffusion CoefficientRebar Depth
NominalRebar DepthRebar Depth
Nominal
� Histograms - field date
Page 28
Diffusion Coefficient
0 25*10-12 m2/s
Diffusion Coefficient
0 25*10-12 m2/s 0.04 0.11 m
Nominal
0.0750.04 0.11 m0.04 0.11 m
Nominal
0.075
240 cores taken from 77 bridge spans: (SOHANGHPURWALA et al., 1998)
�Apparent coefficient of diffusion �Depth of reinforcement
Example – Input Parameters�Parametric distributions - Aproximation
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ
Chloride Threshold
ACI CEB
Frequency of Holidays
(SOHANGHPURWALA et al., 1998)
�Relative position of first holiday – Uniform <0,1>
Crack Depth
0 Deck Depth
0.2 0.4 %
Crack Spacing
0.25m
1.15 mµ=0.7
0 100 m-1
(SOHANGHPURWALA et al., 1998)
�Relative position of first holiday – Uniform <0,1>
� Relative position of first crack – Uniform <0,1>
�Deterministic parameters�Surface Soluble Chloride Concentration - 0.6 [%]
�Depth of Slab – 0.23 [m]
m
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝExample – FEM Macro
� FEM model is used with Monte Carlo � FEM model is used with Monte Carlo
simulation within the SBRA module
framework in ANSYS environment.
� FEM model is repeated 10 000 times with
variable input parameters.
Page 30
variable input parameters.
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝExample - Chloride Concentration
Crack influence
Fre
quen
cy
Exposure 10 years
20
30
10
Page 31Cxy10 [%]
0.0 0.6Chloride Concentration - Cx,10 [%]
Fre
quen
cy
Exposure [years]
50
100C th,ACI =0.2%
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝExample – Corrosion Initiation
Corrosion started
Page 32
Age[years]
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝExample - Sensitivity Analysis
0.4
Diffusion Coefficient
Chloride Threshold
Rebar Depth
Crack Depth
0.0
0.4
Page 33
Chloride Threshold
Holiday Frequency
-0.7
RFxy10 [%]
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ
Probability of Corrrosion Initiation - P ft [%.m-1]
100
Example - Probability of Corrosion Initiation
54
65
7379
8488 90
51
62
7076
82
53
63
7278
8387
90 92
42
93
85
50
75
100
e.g. Pd=50%
Page 34
11
3940
28
31
25
20
25
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Expozition [years]
Cxyt
Black bar
1D Reference
Pd - Tikalsky
d
28 Age [years]
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝParametric Study – Effect of Holidays
Probability of Corrosion Initiation - P ft [%.m -1]ft
com19-dc1-cd0.2-m100-cs1
61
6975
8083
42
7883
8790 92
51
62
7076
8185
51
44
72
63
52
4050
75
100Cxyt-m-100
Cxyt-m-10
Cxyt-m-1
Black bar
Reference 10 times reduced holiday frequency
Page 35
2732
3640 42
11
25
39
25
39
11
44
27
1421
40
0
25
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Age [years]
100 times reduced
Holiday frequency
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝParametric Study – Effect of Diffusion Coefficient
Probability of Corrosion Initiation - P ft [%.m -1]com16-dc1-cd0.2-m10-cs1com16-dc1-cd0.2-m10-cs1
51
61
6975
8083
7278
8387 90
51
62
7076
85
92
63
52
81
50
75
100Cxyt-dc-1
Cxyt-dc-0.1
Black bar-dc-1
Black bar-dc-0.1
Reference-dc-1
Reference-dc-0.1 10 times reduced
Diffusion coefficient
Page 36
25
39
7 8 9 1023 24 25 25 26 27
11
25
51
11 114 5 63
4028
2822
21
39
20
25
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Age [years]
Diffusion coefficient
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝSummary
� Probabilistic approach for estimation of the corrosioninitiation of bridge deck reinforcing steel with by method SBRA using 2-D FEM model in ANSYS is method SBRA using 2-D FEM model in ANSYS is presented.
� SBRA module for ANSYS is used for application of
random variables described by bounded histograms
in Monte Carlo.
� Chloride ingress is modelled by 2.ND Fick’s Law for
Page 37
� Chloride ingress is modelled by 2.ND Fick’s Law for diffusion using 2D FEM application with regards to stochastic interaction of bridge deck crack vs. damaged epoxy-coated rebar system.
� The probability of corrosion initiation is used in order to qualitatively compare various scenarios with respect to durability.
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝConclusions
� Probabilistic approach can be used to study effect of crack and holiday interaction with regards to bridge crack and holiday interaction with regards to bridge deck durability.
� The most important variable is diffusion coefficient(mix design).
� The effect of epoxy-coated reinforcement improves durability under proper handling and construction practices.
Page 38
practices.� The research in the area of reliability of RC bridge
deck is valuable and deserves further attention.
Thank you
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WIT H RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
by
Ing. Petr Konečný
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝQuestions
� Complex chloride transport model� Propagation phase. How do you solve that?� Propagation phase. How do you solve that?� Could you estimate how significant would be
difference between apparent coefficient and real diffusion coefficient?
� Which mechanical properties of the bridge deck and dynamic load affect the degradation of the reinforced concrete deck?
Page 40
concrete deck?� How can these damages be investigated in the real
bridge? How can one calculate these uncertainties?
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ
More Complex Chloride Transport Model
� Simple diffusion model.
x2CC ∂∂ (Eq. 4) (Eq. 5)
−
t
xerfC=C
ctx, 4D
10
1D – model with respect to advection and bound chlorides
2
2
x
CD=
t
Cc ∂
∂∂∂
Cf - Concentration of free κ - Moisture diffusivity
� Diffusion – advection model (Bear and Bachmat)
(Eq. 4) (Eq. 5)
( )t
C
x
wC
xx
CwD
x=
t
wCb
fff
∂∂−
∂∂
∂∂+
∂∂
∂∂
∂∂
κ
Page 41
Cf - Concentration of free chlorides
Cb - Concentration of bound salts
w - Volumetric moisture content
Pavlík Z et al., Water and salt transport and storage properties of Mšené sandstone, Constr. Build. Mater (2007), doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.05.010
κ - Moisture diffusivityD - Salt dispersion
coefficientt - Timex - Depth
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝMore Complex Chloride Transport Model
� Numerical sollution� The 2D FEM macro can be adjusted in order to � The 2D FEM macro can be adjusted in order to
allow for more complex model.� Change of „surface“ chloride concentration.� Advection (moisture transport) model
requires the time-dependent diffusion constant.
� The simple model form (Eq. 4) can be used for 2CC ∂∂
Page 42
� The simple model form (Eq. 4) can be used for qualitative comparison very efficiently.
ROVNANÍKOVÁ, P., PAVLÍK, Z., ČERNÝ, R. (2002). “Měření současného přenosu vody a chloridů jako podklad pro predikci koroze výztuže v betonu. In Beton TKS, 2002, vol. 6, pp. 46-49, (in Czech)
2
2
x
CD=
t
Cc ∂
∂∂∂
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝPropagation phase
� The integration with propagation phase would be useful in order to evaluate the reliability of the useful in order to evaluate the reliability of the structure in terms of carrying capacity.
� Selection of suitable mathematical model for localized corrosion of steel
� Compute the resistance of the RC crossection based on the loss of steel bar area.
� Incorporate it into stochastic analysis and compute
Page 43
� Incorporate it into stochastic analysis and compute the Pf
Pf = P (S – Rt) < Pd (safety)
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ
� Mathematical model for localized corrosion of steel – e.g.
Propagation phase
(Gonzalez et. al.)(Gonzalez et. al.)
pt - depth of the pitψ - uncertainty factort - timeti - time to corrosion initiationicorr – corrosion currentRcorr – 4-8 when localized corrosion
(pitting) occursA
pt
D
Page 44
Ar,t - net cross sectional area of a corroded rebar (Val &Melchers)Gonzales, J.A., Andrade, C., Alonso, C. And Feliu, S. (1995) Comparison of rates of
general corrosion and maximum pitting penetration on concrete embedded steel reinforcement, Cement and Concrete Research, 25(2), p.257-264
Val, D. & Melchers, R.E. (1998) Reliability analysis of deteriorating reinforced concrete frame structures, Structural Safety and Reliability, Balkema, Rotterdam, 105-112
FReET-D PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION , Červenka consulting
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ
Apparent Coefficient vs. Real Diffusion Coefficient
� Aparent diffusion constant can be used for � Aparent diffusion constant can be used for
comparison of different material and
construction scenarios.
� It gives qualitative answer which scenario is
better – which structure would last longer.
Page 45
� It does not adress the question of the change
of Dc over time and depth of slab with respect
to chloride concentration.
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝDegradation, Mechanical Properties and Dynamic Loading
� Which mechanical properties of the bridge deck and dynamic load
affect the degradation of the reinforced concrete deck?affect the degradation of the reinforced concrete deck?
� Cracking depends on the
� Strength (w/c relationship)
� Modulus of elasticity – lower ME – lower stresses
� Shrinkage
� Thermal strain (heat of hydration)
� Structural loading (static and dynamic)
Page 46
� Structural loading (static and dynamic)
� Cracking growth enhanced by traffic induced vibration
� Vibration severity and lenght of span enhance the crack growth more
(Camisa, S.J. et. al., Field Evaluations of Early Age Bridge Deck Behavior, 2003)
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝEpoxy-coating Damage Investigation
� New Structure� New Structure� Reinforcement visual survey before casting
� Existing Structure� Taking core
� Extruding reinforcement
� Visual inspection of the reinforcement with recording of the mashed areas, bare areas etc.
Page 47
mashed areas, bare areas etc.
� Holiday detection can be performed in accordance with ASTM62Method that uses an electrical current flow through a epoxy-coating to indicate the presence of a holiday.
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝOther Questions
Page 48
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝTime-consumption
� 10000 simulations � 10000 simulations
� 60 hours - 100 years of chloride exposure with performance analysis in interval of 5 years.
� 24 hours - 50 years with 10 year intervals are studied, then the analysis takes about.
� One dual core processor of SUN workstation,
Page 49
� One dual core processor of SUN workstation,
12 GB memory and 2.4 Ghz frequency. The
computer has a Linux operating system
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝNumber of Simulation
Pf
Page 50
0 2500 10000
Binary and Ternary Blends�The diffusion coefficient is reduced to reflect the
HPC properties (binary and ternary blends). Other input values remain the same.
NINTH CANMET/ACI INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Warsaw, May 20-25, 2007
Diffusion Coefficient
0 25*10-12 m2/s
Diffusion Coefficient
0 25*10-12 m2/s0.49 m 2 / s
mean
0 25*10-12 m2/s0 25*10-12 m2/s2.5*10-12 m2/s0.49 m 2 / s
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝFrequency of holidays
Frequency of Holidays
1616 m-1
(SOHANGHPURWALA et al., 1998), cca. 240 cores from 77 bridge spans
� Number of holidays* per bar in core:
132 m-10
mean
Page 52
� Number of holidays* per bar in core:� Mean = 12.2
� Max = 169
� Mean bar length = 93 mm (3.7 in)
* Holidays including blisters, bare and mashed areas
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝDiffusion / heat Analogy
• Thermal conductivity – KXX = Dc• Thermal conductivity – KXX = Dc
• Mass density - DENS = 1
• Thermal capacity – C = 1
Page 53
Introduction
� The thesis is focused on a stochastic
reinforced concrete bridge deck 2-D chloride
ingress model.
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ
ingress model.
� The model combines a finite element model
and a Monte Carlo simulation technique for
application with chloride ingress in concrete
with cracks.
Introduction - Chloride Ion Diffusion
� Chloride ingress is modelled by diffusion using 2.ND Ficks law
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝ
2CD=
C ∂∂Dc - Effective diffusion
coefficientt - Time
� 1D –Solution does not allow for chloride ingressmodelling with regards to bridge deck crack vs. damaged epoxy-coated rebar system interaction.
2x
CD=
t
Cc ∂
∂∂∂ t - Time
x - DepthC - Chloride ion
concentration
damaged epoxy-coated rebar system interaction.
−
t
xerfC=C
ctx, 4D
10
C0 - Surface Chloride ion concentration
Cx,t - Chloride ion concentration at depth xin time t.
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝReliability Function vs. Crack Depth
Page 56
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝReliability Function vs. Diffusion Coefficient
Dc[m
2 /s×
10-1
2 ]40
Corrosion Initiated
Page 57
RFxy10[%]
0-0.4 0.40
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝReliability Function vs. Holidays in Epoxy-coating
Mash
N[m
-1]
100Corrosion Initiated
Page 58
RFxy10[%]
Sensitivity to Holiday Frequency
0
10
-0.4 0.40
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝReliability Function vs. Rebar Depth
x[m
]0.12
Corrosion Initiated
Page 59
RFxy10[%]
0.04-0.4 0.40
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝReliability Function vs. Chloride Threshold
Cth
[%]
0.4
Corrosion Initiated
Page 60
RFxy10[%]
0.2-0.4 0.40
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝReliability Function vs. Crack Spacing
Crc
ks[m
]1-D Model
1.2
1.0
Page 61
Crc
k
2-D Model0.2
-0.4 0.40RFxy10[%]
Corrosion Initiated
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝComparison of 2-D and 1-D Solution
Page 62
Epoxy-coating and Crack Effect (left) 1-D Analytical Solution (right),
T=100 years
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝComparison of 2-D and 1-D Solution
Crack Influence
Epoxy-coating Blackbar
Crack Influence
No Holidays
Corrosion InitiatedPf=92%
Corrosion InitiatedPf=93%
Corrosion InitiatedPf=84%
Page 63T=100 years
RFxy100[%] RFblackbar100[%] RFanalytic100[%]-0.4 -0.40.38 0.29 -0.33 -0.310 00
1-D Analytical Solution
(right),
Crack Effect (left)
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝComparison of 2-D and 1-D Solution
1-D
Analytical
Solution
Page 64
Epoxy-coating and Crack Effect
T=100 years
RELIABILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS WITH RESPECT TO INGRESS OF CHLORIDES
Petr KONEČNÝConclusions - more
� Enhancing the model with:� Propagation phase of corrosion.� Early age bridge deck behaviour - crack propagation.� Better characterization of input parameters.� Time-dependent diffusion coefficient and surface.
concentration.
� Programming a stand alone program would bring a model closer to engineers and speed up the
Page 65
model closer to engineers and speed up the simulations.